Matthew, I must agree with a few of the others that I found it hard to realize that the "reply", "notify", etc. buttons were live as they did not turn green as everything else does when you place the cursor on it. If for some reason in 2.0 you are unable to have them turn green then can the neat little icons to the right of them turn green or can the cursor itself turn green? Fred P.S. what a great job you are doing.
Forum Re-Design
- Thread starter Matthew Schenker
- Start date
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
I'd be interested to hear from others if this is an issue, as I am always curious about people's experiences navigating the site.
I guess I'm a little surprised to hear that this is a problem. Yes, text elements do have hover colors, but very often "button-like" elements do not need hover colors (for example, the "F" and "new" indicators) because the transforming mouse pointer is usually enough to indicate that it's active.
In the meantime, I'll look into how to create some kind of hover color on button elements.
Matt
I guess I'm a little surprised to hear that this is a problem. Yes, text elements do have hover colors, but very often "button-like" elements do not need hover colors (for example, the "F" and "new" indicators) because the transforming mouse pointer is usually enough to indicate that it's active.
In the meantime, I'll look into how to create some kind of hover color on button elements.
Matt
Matthew,
The buttons look nice. However, I think they are a step back.
Unlike the icons in the current forum, with the new buttons, the font color does not change during mouseover and the font size is fixed. At least with FireFox, scrolling the mousewheel increases the button font size in production FOG but does not do this in test FOG. On a higher resolution monitor, it's difficult to see the text. This is makes them more difficult to use.
Regards,
Dan.
The buttons look nice. However, I think they are a step back.
Unlike the icons in the current forum, with the new buttons, the font color does not change during mouseover and the font size is fixed. At least with FireFox, scrolling the mousewheel increases the button font size in production FOG but does not do this in test FOG. On a higher resolution monitor, it's difficult to see the text. This is makes them more difficult to use.
Regards,
Dan.
Dan Clark said:
On a higher res monitor...or with older eyes.
Thanks Dan for catching this. Since I routinely change the size back and forth, I frequently don't know what the "normal" image would look like.
I don't know a name for the UI element at the top of the page in both Production and Test, the thing that shows Home, Help, Search, etc. It's not a menu bar, since none of the sub-elements act like menus. They all act like buttons--click it and off you go without further ado. I think it's a button bar, and that's what I'll call it until someone comes up with something better.
All button bars in both production FOG and test FOG respond to this enlargement chosen by the user, including the button bar recently replaced by buttons that we're discussing here.
IMO, no change that degrades the user-controlled flexibility of the site is a good change.
Ned
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
Good afternoon,
OK, I'm going to get rid of those buttons and put back the text. Doesn't seem to be a good option here.
Matthew
OK, I'm going to get rid of those buttons and put back the text. Doesn't seem to be a good option here.
Matthew
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
Good Afternoon,
Just a note to everyone following along: I fixed the background color of the spelling checker in the test forum. Now it is white.
Matthew
Just a note to everyone following along: I fixed the background color of the spelling checker in the test forum. Now it is white.
Matthew
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
Good Morning,
I've made a few more changes to the test site, adding alternating colors. I'm using the same alternating colors we now have in the main forum, since people seem to like those. Check out the test forum to see what the changes look like.
Now that the logo poll is closed, and we have a winner (Andrew Ledbetter's series) I'm smoothing out the way the new logos work with the welcome text. Over the next few days, you can see the progress on this by checking out the test forum.
Although I had originally planed to launch the new site today, I'm delaying implementation for a little bit, as I work to tweak a few more details and allow members to comment some more on various elements. Andrew and I will be working off-line to finalize the logo appearance.
Thanks,
Matthew
I've made a few more changes to the test site, adding alternating colors. I'm using the same alternating colors we now have in the main forum, since people seem to like those. Check out the test forum to see what the changes look like.
Now that the logo poll is closed, and we have a winner (Andrew Ledbetter's series) I'm smoothing out the way the new logos work with the welcome text. Over the next few days, you can see the progress on this by checking out the test forum.
Although I had originally planed to launch the new site today, I'm delaying implementation for a little bit, as I work to tweak a few more details and allow members to comment some more on various elements. Andrew and I will be working off-line to finalize the logo appearance.
Thanks,
Matthew
Daviddubya
Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 704
Looking good Matthew. I imagine you have discovered that you have an error in the placement of the logo right now. It overlays the links on the right side of the banner area.
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
Daviddubya said:
Yes, that's sort of intentional. Andrew is working on redesigning the logos to work better with the welcome text by switching the text and graphic portions (or some other fix). It will make sense soon!
Matthew
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 10,356
Hi,
I think the new forum design is shaping up nicely. On the logo I like the "recent unread post" etc better when stacked up on the right rather than above the logo words. Seems like it is intruding / crowded on the OWNERS GROUP"
Seth
I think the new forum design is shaping up nicely. On the logo I like the "recent unread post" etc better when stacked up on the right rather than above the logo words. Seems like it is intruding / crowded on the OWNERS GROUP"
Seth
Brice Burrell
Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 7,385
Matthew is there a ETA for the change over yet?
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
semenza said:
Yeah, I agree. I just added a new shade -- a very light "blush" of green (don't want to overdo it). Check the test forum now. The trick is seeing how it shows up on different people's monitors, so if everyone would take a look and report back that would be great.
Brice Burrell said:
I'm making sure everything is in place visually and functionally. No need to rush. But I am hoping to confirm the new design by the end of this week and then activate it over the weekend.
While we're discussing this, everyone please take a look at the Test Forum and let me know how it works for you. As I mentioned above, different monitors and different systems may display various things differently.
Couple of recent changes:
1. I fixed the "welcome text" so it does not overlap the text of the logo.
2. Andrew submitted an "edited" version of his logo series -- slightly smaller ones that should work better on smaller monitors.
One last thing: remember that even after the new design is launched, I can still tweak things if necessary.
Matthew
Matthew Schenker
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,619
Ned,
Since you're using an 800px monitor, can you also tell me if the size of the logo is good? Does it occupy too much of the screen, or do you think it works well?
Also, how does the light green shading for the alternating columns look?
Matthew
Since you're using an 800px monitor, can you also tell me if the size of the logo is good? Does it occupy too much of the screen, or do you think it works well?
Also, how does the light green shading for the alternating columns look?
Matthew
Daviddubya
Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 704
Coming together nicely, Matthew. My screen is 1280 X 1024.
A couple of suggestions - put the Welcome text and links in the right side of the banner back the way it was - with Show unread... and Show new... on seperate lines. That text still crowds and overlaps the logo. When it was on four lines instead of three, it worked better, IMHO.
Try the logo in a vertically centered position within the banner, or at least a bit higher. It's close to the bottom now.
The logo and the Welcome text need to work together. They seem to be fighting each other right now.
I like the light green shading.
A couple of suggestions - put the Welcome text and links in the right side of the banner back the way it was - with Show unread... and Show new... on seperate lines. That text still crowds and overlaps the logo. When it was on four lines instead of three, it worked better, IMHO.
Try the logo in a vertically centered position within the banner, or at least a bit higher. It's close to the bottom now.
The logo and the Welcome text need to work together. They seem to be fighting each other right now.
I like the light green shading.
jonny round boy
Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 3,227
Daviddubya said:
I agree - I didn't see the test forum when it was on 4 lines, but it doesn't seem to work on 3. Show unread... and show new.... need to be on separate lines.
Other than that, it looks great!
Matthew Schenker said:
My comment before was based on narrowing the browser window, not actually running 800x600. I have switched my secondary monitor to 800x600, and all the comments here are based on looking at that monitor.
The FOG heading looks fine. The logo's just fine horizontally, and logo and two text areas ("Welcome..." and "Festool..." don't overlap and look pretty good.
The logo defines the vertical space required by the heading, changing text size has no effect. The heading takes up about 30% of the vertical on 800x600.
Since modern browsers let us play with text size, I can't really say "how it looks on 800x600", I can only say how it looks on mine. Ditto questions of color--doesn't look bad on mine.
I do wonder if 800x600 is now obsolete as a minimum, and if 1024x768 or 1280x1024 should be the current minimum. There was a time when we had to make everything workable on 640x480, but now feel safe that approximately no one is running that resolution.
In the same way, should we bother worrying about 256 colors? I think/hope not. Windows Vista won't even go to 256, the minimum is 16-bit ("thousands of colors"). The 800x600 monitor is set to 16-bit, and looks pretty good. The light-green column shading looks light gray and OK.
Overall, I think test FOG looks fine on an 800x600. Reading FOG will require more work scrolling, but that's life on a screen of that resolution. I have looked around the test FOG and don't see anything that's terminally ugly or that sticks the user in an unnavigable position.
Ned
