Thanks for the numbers. Helps a lot.
Made some measurements in my shop. Yes, sample of one, Yes, MDF not in controlled environment, Yes, measurements by inexperienced amateur.
Used a digital Toyo digital caliper calibrated to .001.
Took measurements of thickness every 4 to 5 in around the edges of a 57 in by 35 in (about) piece.
Total measurements 29. Nominal .759 Average .755 Max .788 Min .748
Separately examined flatness with a 48 in flat surface with less than .002 error and standard feeler gauge. The 57 by 35 piece showed a convex bow along both long edges of about .015 and a convex bow diagonal about .025.
Thinking I might be seeing effects of sagging, I flipped piece over. Suprise. Reverse side also showed convex dips. So. Thickness variation in interior of this sheet dominated any error due to sag. Note, this piece of MDF has been lying flat for several months supported by edge and cross mounts that were no better then .010 of flat. Dry, high desert environment.
I have no way of even ball park estimating how much the measurements were affected by environmental effects vs manufacturing variations vs handling (support) effects.
At this time, my personal working conclusion, based on all the info I have at this time, is that MDF with worktable size dimensions should not be expected to be flat to better than about .020 - .030. or about 1/32. Another conclusion is that somehow milling the top flat somehow may not be worthwhile in the long term due to humidity variations plus sag effects.
Does anybody have other opinions?
It might be interesting if a couple other guys with reasonably accurate measuring devices tool some similar measurements on their MFT or custom MFT worktops.