smorgasbord
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Messages
- 1,059
dlu said:[member=77266]smorgasbord[/member], your adaption of the Incra fence to the Kapex is brilliant. I wish I'd thought of that before getting my Cube -- the big thing that I don't like about the Cube (and the stock Kapex fence) is how far my Incra fence ends up away from the blade.
One way to improve that is to make an offset block that's some nice round fixed (and accurate!) dimension, like 30cm or 12", and use that against the flip stop for cuts where the stock wouldn't reach the Incra fence, then subtract that off the tape reading.
One thing I found today with my setup is that my insert block needs to be a bit wider. My saw can cut 60º to the right, which means the blade could hit the Incra fence in its current location even without beveling. I got around that by using a spacer block against the fence so the back of the blade didn't reach there, but I think the better solution might be to move the Incra fence to the left a bit more and make my insert blocks wider. I was cutting the ends of angled legs for my revised tablesaw outfeed table (like I said, I'm doing shop projects these days while I heal enough to lift big panels again), and the needed cuts were 35º and 55º to create a 90º tip that fits inside the outfeed with rear apron.
One really nice thing about not using sacrificial add-on fences is that on most saws I expect the vertical pivot axis (miter angle axis) to be in line with the front of the stock metal fence. When you have a replaceable insert in that same plane, the front kerf doesn't get (much) bigger when you cut different miter angles. When I had sacrificial fences, the ¾" offset meant that each different miter angle cut widened the front kerf a lot and so I was constantly needing to move those fences inwards. With the Cube I expect the same good kerf behavior would also be true.