John Langevin said:Three questions on the upcoming MFT3:
1. Will the leg braces be compatible with the current MFT1080? If so, will they be available separately?
2: Will the new rails with top V-grooves accomodate slide-in clamps that face in towards the table? I find I seldom use the current top of rail slots for clamping because you can't extend the clamp over the work surface.
3: Does the new angle unit (other than bi-directional travel) offer any advantage over the current angle unit; i.e. does it hold its position any better, is it any easier to calibrate, or offer a vernier scale?
Ned Young said:Question: What is the minimum height of the MFT3's fence? The old MFT's fence was 14mm; this made extra work when cutting 1/2" (12.7mm) or thinner stock.
Thanks,
Ned
Shane Holland said:I can tell you that your collective voice has been heard regarding a solution for connecting the gen 2 and gen 3 MFTs. While there is no solution that I can announce, we recognize the concern and it has been conveyed to the engineers. I think there will be a solution, just not sure what it will be and how soon it will be available.
lawhoo said:If the new angle unit registers off the V-groove, does that mean that one couldn't retrofit it to an MFT1080?
Fred West said:Dan, as I told Eli in a PM it was two years ago and luckily it was not a slapshot or I would have been really hurt. As it was I had two blow out fractures of the orbital socket, broke my nose in two places and jammed bone fragments into the maxillary sinus cavity. However, I was back on the ice three weeks later and am fully recovered. In addition I drove myself eight miles to the hospital bleeding like a stuck pig in my hockey gear. They x-rayed me, stitched me up, gave me vicodine and said okay drive yourself home. ;D It was quite an eventful night. At least now I wear a half shield.Again as I mentioned to Eli, I just like the picture and since I don't need to impress any woman, I figured what the heck. :
Fred
Don Bullock said:Matthew,
I know this has been addressed in other threads, but Festool hasn't convinced me that I need a MFT no matter which model they are selling. Maybe I'm crazy (very possible), but I don't see the advantages of having one at least for the price they are charging. Yes, I do see the advantage of many Festool products and plan to add some to the sander I already have. I'm certainly not one of those people who think that all Festool products are over priced.
Don Bullock said:Matthew,
I know this has been addressed in other threads, but Festool hasn't convinced me that I need a MFT no matter which model they are selling. Maybe I'm crazy (very possible), but I don't see the advantages of having one at least for the price they are charging. Yes, I do see the advantage of many Festool products and plan to add some to the sander I already have. I'm certainly not one of those people who think that all Festool products are over priced.
Fred West said:Ted, I have funded his retirement at the very least if not a new house.![]()
As far as the MFT, I very much used to be one of those that did not see the need for one. Now, after owning and using three 1080s, I am pretty much convinced that the tables may very well be the single most important and functional tool that Festool sells. Fred