Must have Festool kit?

woodbutcherbower said:
Crazyraceguy said:
woodbutcherbower said:
Always interesting to read replies to a post like this. One man's meat is another man's poison as the saying goes. I'm a professional woodworker with 40 years on the tools. I have 4 pieces of Festool equipment (and very fine it is, too) - but I also have a lot of other equipment from numerous different manufacturers, which - for me, dramatically outperforms the comparable Festool offering. Don't allow yourself to get sucked and marketed into one-brand slavery, and don't deny yourself access to something great, just because it doesn't come in a grey and green box.

The ones I'm interested in are the tools that you believe "dramatically outperform" Festool.
The most important term there though is "comparable", because nothing compares to a Domino.

Both versions of the Domino are stellar, and as you say, it’s a unique product. I don’t do the type of work which enables me to justify one, however. But since you asked the question;

Hilti SF6H 22v combi - the most robust, reliable combi imaginable. Open this thing up and you’ll find a gearbox which looks like it came out of a miniature Kenworth or Scania truck. I have two  — the original Gen 1 plus the newer Gen 2 brushless.

Hilti SID-22A 22v impact driver - see comments above.

Hilti TE-30AVR SDS - 12 years old, it’s been absolutely tortured and looks like junk, but it still works as well as the day I bought it.

Hilti DD-150 diamond core drill. Not really relevant since Festool don’t make such a tool. I’d also mention the fact that their service offering is world-class. If anything fails (which hardly ever happens) - a courier comes to site and collects it the same day, the local rep drops off a temporary replacement, they repair the tool and return it to a place of your choosing within three days. They continue to make and stock parts for tools for at least 10 years after the last one came off the line.

Mafell P1CC jigsaw - the only jigsaw Ive ever found which consistently cuts scrolled curves in timber whose edges are totally square to the surface. I bought mine at a tool show after a rep demonstrated the machine cutting a perfect square-edged circle around a £2 coin in 40mm thick oak countertop.

Mirka Deros 5650CV - just works for me. I love the near-silent operation, the feather-light weight and several other aspects of it.

Makita RP1100 quarter-inch router - I do a lot of work involving hinge rebates on in-situ door frames. The OF1010’s  parallel fence sits at 90 degrees to the handle, so you can’t get it anywhere near the head of a door frame before the handle, power cable and extractor hose all hit it.

Hilti AG125 grinder- it has a hugely efficient dust control shroud on the cutter head which means that dustless cutting of slate, quartz, granite and tiles is possible.

Fein 350 Multimaster - the quietest, lowest-vibration and best-performing multi I’ve used. Downside is the Starlock Plus head admittedly - it’s proprietary so I’m locked into buying expensive Fein blades.

DeWalt DWS 780 mitre saw - I do a lot of heavy framing and construction work. The thing’s indestructible and built like a Sherman tank. Super accurate and fully adjustable for those times when it’s been in and out of the van a hundred times and has been knocked slightly out of square. Dust control is absolutely hopeless, but it’s almost always used outdoors so it’s not really an issue. The DE7023 saw stand is also stellar, and indispensable to me since my stock is always supplied in 4.8m or 5.4m lengths.

Makita LS0714 mitre saw - simply the best-built, most accurate small 2nd-fix saw I’ve ever found.

Paslode IM65A 16g Brad gas nailer - again, no Festool equivalent.

As I said in my first post - we all have different ways of working our tools and consequently have different priorities. My own personal choices have all evolved over four decades and everything works for me.

Kind regards.
The Deros and P1CC are marvels indeed.

But 3/4 of the stuff you mention are construction tools which are actually not made by Festool/TTS anymore. Sure, one can abuse a Kapex as a framing saw, but it is not what it is made for.

TTS had the Protool brand a decade ago where they tried to go after the construction business with heavy tools (most OEM from smaller German companies) but it did not work so they folded it up.

The Festool focus us usability and finesse. So comparing e.g. a Kapex with the DWS780 is pointless. The only thing these have in common is both are mitre saws.
Same the Hilti SDS stuff (did Hilti not invent SDS or something?) and the installers handy mini-SDS Festool makes. Both make hammer drills, but for a completely different purpose so do not really compete with each other.

One note, you specifically not correct is the the Hilti AG125.

The Protool/Festool AGC 125 has dust collection accessories which were the unique in the mass market two decades ago and are still up there on the top while not "special" anymore. True, they do not fit (without a shim like I used) to the AGC18, but that is again a separate topic.

Not trying to "Defend" Festool.
But almost none of the tools you mention have a direct Festool counterpart. And that is likely not an accident - Festool has a policy where they do not introduce a new tool if the cannot be better than the top competition in some way. Take the Carvex, instead of improving the Trion to go after the P1CC they made an extremely flexible product which can do what P1CC cannot BUT cannot do many things P1CC can. Stepping sideways instead of making a clone of someones marvel.
 
where is this policy you are quoting

Festool has a policy where they do not introduce a new tool if the cannot be better than the top competition in some way.

both the grinder and multitool are fein. also i dont see any dust collection for the festool grinder in canada. absolutely none.

This is also incorrect
Downside is the Starlock Plus head admittedly - it’s proprietary so I’m locked into buying expensive Fein blades.
 
I wonder what the tools made by the North American manufacturers, if Festool never existed, would be like today. Every industry needs innovators to set the bench mark for the rest. It seems that most manufacturers are quite satisfied with pumping out whatever they hope you will buy and make money. But innovators are never satisfied with the status quo. Most are quite interested in copying the innovations but have no desire to pay the costs to be innovators … R&D. Apple sets the bench mark in their field and Festool does it in theirs.

I do wish North American manufacturers would be smart enough to copy Festools idea for longer detachable cords but then again the North American manufacturers don't believe that is a deal breaker so they will save a few bucks and cut the cord.

Are the non Festool tools you buy good because maybe Festool has forced their manufacturers to make better tools?

Many still believe you need a table saw to build a set of cabinets but i can build a set of cabinets with a track saw and do it safely. Thanks Festool for the innovation …
 
top of my head

porter cable gave us the random orbit sander - also: helical drive circ saw, portable electric belt sander /https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter-Cable

Delta Machinery (Rockwell) - first power miter saw /https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Machinery

black and decker -  hand-held electric drill with a pistol grip and trigger switch  /https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black+Decker

vise grips -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Industrial_Tools

milwaukee - hammer drill and sawzall /https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee_Electric_Tool

nothing fancy but unfair to say NA does not invent things. Companies shuffled ownerships since, and they definitely focus on different markets.

Wayne CW said:
I wonder what the tools made by the North American manufacturers, if Festool never existed, would be like today. Every industry needs innovators to set the bench mark for the rest. It seems that most manufacturers are quite satisfied with pumping out whatever they hope you will buy and make money. But innovators are never satisfied with the status quo. Most are quite interested in copying the innovations but have no desire to pay the costs to be innovators … R&D. Apple sets the bench mark in their field and Festool does it in theirs.

I do wish North American manufacturers would be smart enough to copy Festools idea for longer detachable cords but then again the North American manufacturers don't believe that is a deal breaker so they will save a few bucks and cut the cord.

Are the non Festool tools you buy good because maybe Festool has forced their manufacturers to make better tools?

Many still believe you need a table saw to build a set of cabinets but i can build a set of cabinets with a track saw and do it safely. Thanks Festool for the innovation …
 
3/4 of the stuff you mention are construction tools.

Really? The only product which I'd class as a genuine 'construction tool' is the diamond core drill. Everything else on that list has a direct Festool equivalent except the Paslode (which is a 16-gauge gas bradder, not a framing nailer) - it's used for final finishing in joinery work - attaching mouldings, cornices, architraves, baseboards, trims, pinning mitres, fixing wainscotting and similar. It's a woodworking tool. Two out of twelve is hardly 'three-quarters' - is it? Over here in the UK, our schoolkids on day #1, lesson #1 of 'how to do fractions' are taught that it's one-sixth.

Sure, one can abuse a Kapex as a framing saw, but it is not what it is made for. So comparing a Kapex with the DWS780 is pointless. The only thing these have in common is both are mitre saws.

What? A £1200 mitre saw which can't be used to cut wood unless it's working within a certain restricted set of arbitrary limits? And how is cutting certain types and certain sizes of timber 'abusing' the tool? A huge amount of my work is ultra-high-end restoration and heritage work for major UK organisations such as the National Trust and English Heritage where finish quality is critical - irrespective of whether I'm cutting a replacement green oak kingpost on a 300-year-old roof, or using a 96-tooth blade to cut a compound mitre on a curving stair handrail on a 200-year old mahogany staircase worth ££££££. My (obviously misguided) concept of a 12" mitre saw is one which can do anything from crosscutting railway ties through to delicately dissecting super-fine mouldings, with total accuracy and virtually 100% mechanical reliability - which the DWS780 does, and does exceptionally well. My current machine has close to 7,000 hours on the clock and all I've ever replaced is motor brushes and the zero clearance insert. You'll find that real-world carpenters/joiners (y'know - guys like me who do this for a living, 8-10 hours every day, 50 weeks of the year) need a skilled, nimble-footed, all-round-talented football player, but one who is also strong, muscular and not afraid of some rough and tumble. Not a snowflake ballet dancer who buckles at the first sign of anything remotely strenuous.

The Festool focus is usability and finesse.

I agree. My OF2200 is the best half-inch router in the world, by a country mile. My TS55 isn't without its faults, but it's delivered tens of thousands of quality cuts for me now for almost 10 years. My CTM26/CT-VA-20 are stellar. My CTL-SYS is the best thing out there for small trim work involving just a few cuts. Even my SYS-Powerhub is enormously useful and a hundred times better than a junky cable reel. But usability and finesse aren't proprietary to Festool. There's no magic unicorn dust.

Same the Hilti SDS stuff and the installers handy mini-SDS Festool makes. Both make hammer drills, but for a completely different purpose so do not really compete with each other.

An SDS is used to drill holes and fix stuff to walls. So is a hammer drill. Could you explain exactly what you mean by 'a completely different purpose?'

One note, you specifically not correct is the the Hilti AG125. The Protool/Festool AGC 125 has dust collection accessories.

No it doesn't. If it did, I'd have seriously considered it, as I would really love to have gone cordless.

Not trying to "Defend" Festool.

Yes you are. You absolutely are - and the multitude of exaggerations and falsehoods in your reply is ample testament to that. I love my Festool equipment - really I do. I'm not criticizing the company or its products in any conceivable way. Why should I? It's great equipment and I'm a loyal customer of 10 years' standing. But I'm also open-minded, non-biased, and experienced enough to realise that there's other great equipment out there which comes in boxes coloured red, blue, orange, yellow, and purple.

Almost none of the tools you mention have a direct Festool counterpart.

Yes they do. Every single one, apart from the two mentioned in my opening paragraph. If I wasn't already losing the will to live, I'd list them all. Maybe someone else on here with a better knowledge of the whole product range will kindly make the list on my behalf. Why are you saying these things when they're completely untrue?

Festool has a policy where they do not introduce a new tool if the cannot be better than the top competition in some way.

Wow. No disrespect intended whatsoever - but it strikes me that unless you work on their research team and have first-hand experience of their marketing strategy and product development focus, I've inadvertently stumbled upon the ultimate Festool evangelist, completely locked in and 100% blinkered to the remotest possibility that any other manufacturer is fit to lick the soles of Festool's shoes, or worship at the hallowed grey-and-green altar of perfection. You exaggerate and use either half-truths or blatant lies to justify whatever strange agenda you have.

This is a public forum and you're entitled to your opinion of course - but me? All I did was to answer a fellow forum member's question about my other equipment, and in doing so, I politely explained why these items suited me in the context of the work I do. I didn't preach, I didn't lie, I didn't exaggerate, I didn't try to justify how I spend the money I work hard to earn, my reply was completely factual, unbiased and objective.

Big mistake, obviously.

Oh - and to the other poster who said that Fein's Starlock Plus isn't proprietary - it is. It's a totally unique quick-release tool head shape and locking mechanism to standard Starlock (which is probably what you were thinking of) which is out of patent and is thus reproducible by every manufacturer. Don't believe me? Google 'Starlock Plus blades' and see how many aftermarket ones you can find .........
 
i'm with you on everything else but you can use non plus blades is what I meant you are not locked in to Fein, unless you must have Plus
also i thought Bosh makes Starlock plus as well. is this not the samehttps://www.boschtools.com/ca/en/boschtools-ocs/corded-oscillating-multi-tools-gop40-30c-143750-p/

Oh - and to the other poster who said that Fein's Starlock Plus isn't proprietary - it is. It's a totally unique quick-release tool head shape and locking mechanism to standard Starlock (which is probably what you were thinking of) which is out of patent and is thus reproducible by every manufacturer. Don't believe me? Google 'Starlock Plus blades' and see how many aftermarket ones you can find .........
 
usernumber1 said:
i'm with you on everything else but you can use non plus blades is what I meant you are not locked in to Fein, unless you must have Plus
also i thought Bosh makes Starlock plus as well. is this not the samehttps://www.boschtools.com/ca/en/boschtools-ocs/corded-oscillating-multi-tools-gop40-30c-143750-p/

Oh - and to the other poster who said that Fein's Starlock Plus isn't proprietary - it is. It's a totally unique quick-release tool head shape and locking mechanism to standard Starlock (which is probably what you were thinking of) which is out of patent and is thus reproducible by every manufacturer. Don't believe me? Google 'Starlock Plus blades' and see how many aftermarket ones you can find .........

That's the first reference I've ever seen to anyone else making a Starlock Plus machine - thankyou for correcting me. I've tried to find it via Google, but it seems to be only available in North America as a 120-volt machine. And trust me - I've tried standard Starlocks on the Fein (at a quarter of the price) but they have a completely different lock pattern and don't fit at all. I'll definitely see if I can locate some of these Bosch blades though. Thanks for the heads-up.

[attachimg=1]
 

Attachments

  • index.png
    index.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 2,752
usernumber1 said:
also i thought Bosh makes Starlock plus as well.
Can confirm: I have a mix of Bosch/Fein/Festool blades for my OSC 18. All are high-quality; the Bosch blades are a bit cheaper, but they don't make nearly the range that Fein does.

I believe the Festool blades are made by Fein, if memory serves, but at least in North America, they sell blades in dimensions that Fein doesn't: most notably the 78mm blades intended for use with the Vecturo's plunge base.

Incidentally, I think it's a bit of a mistake to write off the Vecturo and AGC 18 by looking at them in isolation and saying, "they didn't improve on Fein". I'm happy to pay a premium for getting two of Fein's best tools in a form that tightly integrates with my existing Festool kit. I use tools from a variety of brands, but that doesn't mean I want to have any more incompatible batteries and chargers than strictly necessary. If Festool rolled out rebadged Hilti drills and impact drivers I would be absolutely giddy since it would mean one more set of chargers to cut down.
 
woodbutcherbower said:
I think you take it too seriously.

When I say what is the -intent/goal/objective- it does not necessarily mean they have achieved it. Nor that I condone it universally. I do when it results in a product I like, of course.

Sometimes they add a feature which does not see much use, and the tool ends up good in a very narrow niche while being overpriced for the common use case.
Sometimes they hit jackpot and introduce a feature which transforms the market. Hit/Miss basically.

From what I observe, this is their business model the last two decades or so. They have some "filler" tools, but even there they always try to put in some capability or feature that can justify the premium prices they want to charge.

I do not want a turf war here, so will try to articulate on one point - the SDS drills - where Hilti is the top dog bare none so is a good example.
Same the Hilti SDS stuff and the installers handy mini-SDS Festool makes. Both make hammer drills, but for a completely different purpose so do not really compete with each other.

An SDS is used to drill holes and fix stuff to walls. So is a hammer drill. Could you explain exactly what you mean by 'a completely different purpose?'
BHC purpose:
Making smallish - usually 4-6 mm, at times 8mm - holes into concrete for installing cabinets etc.
Key features: Small, Light, suspended handle /not common in this class/
Limitation: low power (adequate for the purpose but nothing more)

There is only ONE semi-equivalent Hilti tool - TE 2-A22 - all other Hilti hammers are way bigger class and in no way compare to the BHC.
Well, these are still not comparable. The Hilti is heavier, weaker, way longer (matters for small/short bits) and has no suspension.

The Hilti is a tool for the construction worker or installer who makes 100s of holes a day.
The Festool is a tool for the cabinet installer who makes 10 holes a day, usually less. It can probably survive the construction crew handling. But it is not meant for that. Hilti is meant for that use and does an excellent job there while for the installer it would seem "rough" compare to the BHC.

I have a bigger Bosch 3J hammer. And I still bought the BHC because most of the time I do not need a powerful and HEAVY hammer but I still need something stronger than a percussion.

EDIT: Checked for fun, and the TE2-A22 is actually more expensive than the BHC over here. That is fine with me. Mechanically I would expect it to be a stronger, more survivable tool.

One note, you specifically not correct is the the Hilti AG125. The Protool/Festool AG 125 has dust collection accessories.

No it doesn't. If it did, I'd have seriously considered it, as I would really love to have gone cordless.

I have and use all three accessories for the AG 125 with my AGC 18 using a shim (reference below). They are kinda overpriced, but they do work well. Unfortunately they are kinda hard to get as these are a carry-over from the Protool  times and apparently do not sell that well.

I have no Hilti attachment to compare in practice so can only state that there is almost no micro-dust when using either the DCC-AG or DCG-AG. The DCG-AG FH is the odd one and id kinda compromise so dust collection there is not optimal but still works OK for where the DCG-AG cannot be used.https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10027688https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10035942https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10027673
 
Interesting that the CXS gets so much love, I have a BOSCH GSR 12V-15 FC which is similar to the CXS and my most user driver! Out of interest, what's so special about the CXS? Without ever having touched one, I'd imagine it's smaller & lighter than a "normal" drill, and has the angle & offset attachments so great for tight spaces. I've never considered Festool drills as on paper, other brands seem better for the price and I'm not already invested in their batteries but naturally, this is only 1/2 the story.

One tool I forgot to mention but is high on my wish list is the ES ETS edge sander (thanks for reminding me Mino!), I just need to decide whether to go corded or cordless... I'm in a workshop so corded makes sense (cheaper and no need for batteries, will be connected to a vac anyway) but cordless is shiny and feels more flexible...

The Domino and edge sander seem specific to Festool, other brands make similar items but are not quite the same. Is anything else specific to Festool?
 
Freetime101 said:
One tool I forgot to mention but is high on my wish list is the ES ETS edge sander (thanks for reminding me Mino!), I just need to decide whether to go corded or cordless... I'm in a workshop so corded makes sense (cheaper and no need for batteries, will be connected to a vac anyway) but cordless is shiny and feels more flexible...

They offer a mains-adapter for the cordless.

I have an RTSC and it runs corded with the adapter most of the time, but it was helpful to be able to run it on battery for the odd task.

I think we who have the CXS love it due to ergonomics and control.
I used the Bosch drivers in the past and a lot of other brands.
The CXS is more like an extension of the hand rather than a tool in your hand, if you ask me.

The Domino has „cousins“ in the Mafell Duo-Doweller and the Lamello Zeta-P, but they all have their niches with different approaches for applications and costs.
 
grobkuschelig said:
They offer a mains-adapter for the cordless.

This is true, making the only real difference the cost... Corded is slightly faster (12,000 vs 10,000 min) but I have no idea what this means in use... (obviously it'll sand faster but would the difference matter...)
 
Freetime101 said:
grobkuschelig said:
They offer a mains-adapter for the cordless.

This is true, making the only real difference the cost... Corded is slightly faster (12,000 vs 10,000 min) but I have no idea what this means in use... (obviously it'll sand faster but would the difference matter...)
The corded one is a bit lighter and the handle is a bit smaller without a battery. But for hobby use this is negligible, same as the speed difference. It is a finish sander, so material removal rate is not really important there. I would not buy the power adapter from the get go. For hobby use the battery runtime should be fine on itself.

If you plan on having only one of them, the cordless is IMO the better choice. Coupled with DTSC for the odd corner later on you are pretty much set for sheet goods processing.

These are no replacements for the ETS EC series though when you want to sand raw lumber etc.
 
There's really no such thing as must-have tool or kit from Festool. Countless woodworkers in the world do great stuff without owning or using any Festool tools, and that supports my first statement.

The only exception is the Kapex...at least according to this fellow who can't sleep without one! [big grin] [tongue] (The guy's look reminds me of the SAW movies.)
 

Attachments

  • proof.JPG
    proof.JPG
    51.6 KB · Views: 346
ChuckM said:
There's really no such thing as must-have tool or kit from Festool. Countless woodworkers in the world do great stuff without owning or using any Festool tools, and that supports my first statement.

The only exception is the Kapex...at least according to this fellow who can't sleep without one! [big grin] [tongue] (The guy's look reminds me of the SAW movies.)

Unless a guy is willing to take the time required to make Mortice and Tennon joints, in any of the several ways to make them happen, a Domino is pretty much a must have. Of course as a hobbyist, that time may not matter, but if you are making money with your work, it does.
Sure, you could drill holes with a brace & bit, then drive screws by hand, but who wants to do that?

This whole topic is basically, "it depends"......on a number of factors.
I worked in the custom department of a large cabinet shop for about 10 years before ever having/using any Festool equipment. My first was a DF500 and it made a huge change in the way I work. A few months later, I got an RO90. Again, big difference compared to the other sanders I had.
Next was MFK700, for solid wood edges on shelves or countertops. I bought a CXS to replace a 12v Bosch drill/ driver/ and right angle drill. One tool in place of three.
I got along fine with just those 4 for about 5 years, until a fire killed them all.
During the recovery, I got a TS55 as part of a huge bundle. It was very handy while a bunch of new stationary equipment arrived and was set-up. The routers were just added because of the ability to use them with the track, then impressed me in other ways too.
At this point, I wouldn't give up any of them. Absolutely necessary? No, but I wouldn't want to go back to the hard way. When you earn your living with them, time and convenience matter.

On a side-note. Duo-doweler, not even close to as versatile.
Lamello Zeta is a fabulous tool, but it is more of a compliment to the Domino than a substitute for it. It has the same limitations as a standard biscuit joiner as far as width.

 
Crazyraceguy said:
Unless a guy is willing to take the time required to make Mortice and Tennon joints, in any of the several ways to make them happen, a Domino is pretty much a must have.Snip.
A better machine (or a better way of doing things) doesn't make it a "must-have."
 
ChuckM said:
Crazyraceguy said:
Unless a guy is willing to take the time required to make Mortice and Tennon joints, in any of the several ways to make them happen, a Domino is pretty much a must have.Snip.
A better machine (or a better way of doing things) doesn't make it a "must-have."

If time matters, it does.
 
woodbutcherbower said:
Hilti TE-30AVR SDS - 12 years old, it’s been absolutely tortured and looks like junk, but it still works as well as the day I bought it.

Those Hilti TE-series SDS drills are amazing. I worked in heavy tunnel construction for 10 years and we always had 8-10 of these on site. They are so tough and reliable. I’ve never seen tools take such abuse and still keep backing up every day. No other SDS machine comes close in my opinion.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I am still using my TE-17 that I bought used 25 years ago. It's still going, can't kill it.
 
Crazyraceguy said:
ChuckM said:
Crazyraceguy said:
Unless a guy is willing to take the time required to make Mortice and Tennon joints, in any of the several ways to make them happen, a Domino is pretty much a must have.Snip.
A better machine (or a better way of doing things) doesn't make it a "must-have."

If time matters, it does.

I bet there's tons of people working in the same business as you who don't have a domino and don't miss it at all. Nothing's absolute.
 
Back
Top