Cochese said:Has anyone asked how you are storing your rails in the first pic?
Wow - 24673 times - and here I thought I had gotten a lot of interest in this unit - only you & 327 others!Baremeg55 said:Squarecut, uh, sorry, I keep coming back to this thread to check out the design.... To date, I've probably revisited this thread, oh, like, 24,673 times. LOL.
Seriously though, nice design, and a few months from now will undertake a similar design. Well thought out design! Thanks for sharing.
Dan Clark said:Right now, the biggest issue for me is whether to use my current MFT (old version) with the legs removed or to make/buy an MFT top. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks,
Dan.
Bob,squarecut said:Dan Clark said:Right now, the biggest issue for me is whether to use my current MFT (old version) with the legs removed or to make/buy an MFT top. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks,
Dan.
Dan,
Thanks for your kind words. When I built my unit, not having an existing MFT made the choice simple. In answer to your question, I would still go with a complete fabrication & save your existing MFT as an auxiliary table or sell it to absorb some of the costs of building from scratch.
My reasoning is as follows -
Your existing MFT is probably a 1080 and you will get some necessary Festool components from it for use on the new unit.
By building your own table frame it will be easier to utilize some of my design components such as index holes for alignment of the 1400 rail for rip cuts and index pins on the extension wings where they mate to the table frame
Of course the main reason is that buying a replacement MFT-3 top gives you more real estate than with a 1080 top.
When I built my unit I only purchased one MFT-3 replacement top and fabricated the wings myself. Only after spending 16 man hours doing so, did I realize that I could have bought a second top and cut it in half, saving myself much time & anguish over hole alignment.
Bob (aka Squarecut)
Dan Clark said:Bob,squarecut said:Dan Clark said:Right now, the biggest issue for me is whether to use my current MFT (old version) with the legs removed or to make/buy an MFT top. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks,
Dan.
Dan,
Thanks for your kind words. When I built my unit, not having an existing MFT made the choice simple. In answer to your question, I would still go with a complete fabrication & save your existing MFT as an auxiliary table or sell it to absorb some of the costs of building from scratch.
My reasoning is as follows -
Your existing MFT is probably a 1080 and you will get some necessary Festool components from it for use on the new unit.
By building your own table frame it will be easier to utilize some of my design components such as index holes for alignment of the 1400 rail for rip cuts and index pins on the extension wings where they mate to the table frame
Of course the main reason is that buying a replacement MFT-3 top gives you more real estate than with a 1080 top.
When I built my unit I only purchased one MFT-3 replacement top and fabricated the wings myself. Only after spending 16 man hours doing so, did I realize that I could have bought a second top and cut it in half, saving myself much time & anguish over hole alignment.
Bob (aka Squarecut)
Thanks for the feedback, especially about buying a second MFT-3 top. One of my goals is to cut hassle-factor. I like to save money, but getting quality and reducing hassle-factor trumps saving money.
Thanks,
Dan.
rvieceli said:Dan if you are going to keep your 1080, you might want to get a replacement MFT-1080 top instead of a MFT/3. The 1080 top is actually a bit bigger and the price is 120 instead of 134.