Seen a video on Instagram of a new dust extractor. Looks to be a cheaper model perhaps? Instagram linkhttps://www.instagram.com/p/B5BCXA7qb1r/?igshid=vdi3jrtsb9vi
Screen grab
Screen grab
Kylec57 said:Looks to be a cheaper model perhaps?
DynaGlide said:They're calling it the CT15. I recall that showing up somewhere in a parts number leak a while back.
mrB said:Certainly an upgraded design if so. And if it's in the same price range as the CT17 it'll probably sell very well. .
SRSemenza said:Hmmmm, I don't know. Foot print is smaller. But having to pile the hose on top pretty much negates any real size advantage.
And no Systainer attachment.
Those taken together I think I would want a regular Mini or Midi. And even though a Midi is technically larger it would most likely be smaller in actual use when it comes to convenience and real space. Looks like purely a price targeted item.
Seth
SRSemenza said:. . And no Systainer attachment. .
Seth
mrB said:SRSemenza said:. . And no Systainer attachment. .
Seth
Oh rubbish. I had thought it looked like you could, hence my comment on the better design. .
xedos said:Who do we think this is going to be aimed at ?
The core customer isn't going to want it for punch out work because the ct-sys is just better suited. They're not likely to want it for regular or shop like work either. Too low a capacity, and the separators won't fit on it.
I can't imagine it being cheap enough to go after the on the fence crowd either.
Puzzled
tobiaskurz said:For me it locks that the Sys-dock isn't the only missing feature.
The CT 15 (if its so called) has no brake, the manual filter cleaning function wich the CT MINI/MIDI has is missing. Most important the Bluetooth connectivity is missing although.
Alongside with the already mention non Antistatic house there is an huge gap between the CT 15 and the CT MINI/MIDI.
I am curious if it is cheep enough to compensate all downsides.