I fully agree to this. While saw stop is a step into the right direction it would be better if the feature would be destruction free to both limbs and the saw.DeformedTree said:Making sure when things like some sort of new tech or safety device is mandated that standardization/interchangeability is mandated with it solves a lot of these issues. This is the key. If you saw "saw stop" is mandated, you have an issue. If you say "saws must stop/or remove blade from path of flesh within 1 nano-second of detection and be fully reset able without replacement of parts" you will have solutions produced with little issue. And manufactures would probably jointly share the development cost to just get it done and move on.
AndrewG said:Just wondering if the 18V impact driver has been confirmed? And if so, when we might get some more information. Thanks
Gregor said:I fully agree to this. While saw stop is a step into the right direction it would be better if the feature would be destruction free to both limbs and the saw.
The reasoning behind that is simple: the knowledge that tripping the feature equals to this days pay (or more) being gone (plus having to carry spares for the blade and mechanism) gives incentive to employ the 'cost saving' method of disabling the mechanism... which completely defeats the whole idea.
Gregor said:I fully agree to this. While saw stop is a step into the right direction it would be better if the feature would be destruction free to both limbs and the saw.DeformedTree said:Making sure when things like some sort of new tech or safety device is mandated that standardization/interchangeability is mandated with it solves a lot of these issues. This is the key. If you saw "saw stop" is mandated, you have an issue. If you say "saws must stop/or remove blade from path of flesh within 1 nano-second of detection and be fully reset able without replacement of parts" you will have solutions produced with little issue. And manufactures would probably jointly share the development cost to just get it done and move on.
The reasoning behind that is simple: the knowledge that tripping the feature equals to this days pay (or more) being gone (plus having to carry spares for the blade and mechanism) gives incentive to employ the 'cost saving' method of disabling the mechanism... which completely defeats the whole idea.
Gregor said:I fully agree to this. While saw stop is a step into the right direction it would be better if the feature would be destruction free to both limbs and the saw.
The reasoning behind that is simple: the knowledge that tripping the feature equals to this days pay (or more) being gone (plus having to carry spares for the blade and mechanism) gives incentive to employ the 'cost saving' method of disabling the mechanism... which completely defeats the whole idea.
That was impressive compared to the 450 - 600 pound SawStop cabinet saws.RKA said:Snip.
The whole table moves when the blade killer activates.
Peter Halle said:Are you talking about the jerking? If so, I would expect that based on the portability and hopefully lack of weight. And physics.
Peter
Cheese said:Snip.
That's the reason the Reaxx is so nice...[crying] [crying] [crying] Bosch really did build a better mousetrap as far as blade safety is concerned.
Instead of costing $250 per event it's only $50 per event. [big grin]
ChuckM said:Gregor said:I fully agree to this. While saw stop is a step into the right direction it would be better if the feature would be destruction free to both limbs and the saw.
The reasoning behind that is simple: the knowledge that tripping the feature equals to this days pay (or more) being gone (plus having to carry spares for the blade and mechanism) gives incentive to employ the 'cost saving' method of disabling the mechanism... which completely defeats the whole idea.
I have yet to come across any SawStop owners who disable their finger-saving technology in order to save costs. To disable the safety feature to cut metals or wet wood, yes, but to do so to avoid triggering the safety technology in a normal operaton is news to me. A better way to save costs is to sell the SawStop and get any other cabinet saw.
If someone is an employee and disables the safety feature (for not activating the SawStop and not for cutting wet wood or metal) without management approval, they could be violating their company safety policy or regulations that could lead to disciplinary measures including termination. I know at least one woodworking company that clearly states that failure to comply with the company safety regulations is a valid cause for instant dismissal.
I started using the SawStop around 2006 and have become an owner myself since 2014. I have not had one single close or remote call with any tablesaw during my whole hobby life of woodworking that began in the 90s. I am planning to keep that track record till the end.
Now, I hope Festool will develop the SawStop technology for its Kapex one day.
DeformedTree said:Snip.
I think you missed some context, this was in the context of if "hot dog protection" was mandated on all saws.
Nice how quiet they managed to make it. [tongue]simonh said:New Kapex KS 120 REB video
Having been that secretive about new stuff lead to one less sale, now that I have one from the competition I don't need theirs.tobiaskurz said:I found pictures from the new OSC 18 wich seems to be available from April (in Germany).
tobiaskurz said:I found pictures from the new OSC 18 wich seems to be available from April (in Germany).
[attachimg=1]
The second picture shows a new dust shroud for over head work.
[attachimg=2]