Bohdan said:
The diameter of water column is not relevant as it is a reading of vacuum pressure.
Approximately 30' of water column corresponds to 1 atmosphere or about 15psi.
This reading is generally a max static pressure reading, the hose is blocked there is no airflow, and so gives little information about its performance in collecting dust but tells you that you can use longer or smaller hoses to achieve the same results.
Am I understanding this correctly? CFM is the main characteristic of dust/chip lifting.
The bigger the water column reading means that the smaller hose (opening) can be used to achieve same air flow (varying from maximum opening at which the CFM test was performed)?
So the system with 1500 CFM at 6" outlet will produce much less cfm if the opening is blocked either by a narrower hose or by the tool itself because its water column reading is only couple of inches. And so the motor won't be able to build enough pressure to suck extra air through smaller opening.
With that in mind
Dust Cobra is designed for 245 CFM at 2.5" opening @23" SP (what could that mean?). While Festool is 137 CFM for 2" (without any [member=2645]SP[/member] conventionalities, who needs those

).
Would be really interesting to know what CFM Cobra shows with 2" hose and vice versa Festool with 2.5" opening.
As well would be nice to have some sort of graphic for each dust separator (especially those huge cyclones with ducts) showing relationship between CFM and the size of opening. Coming from say 0.78 square inch opening all the way to 28 (roughly from 1" to 6" diameter hoses).
That kind of graph would put all the performance questions to bed.
In my application the router pressure foot actually has 2" port but we are using 2.5" hose from Ridgid vac that delivers 179 CFM (at 2.5"). Ridgid does not seem to have water column reading available, so hard to tell what happens at 2". Also the filter is getting clogged a lot which decreases CFM and the filtration is none HEPA. And even while the port on the router pressure foot is 2" the blast gates on the bottom, that allow outside air to be sucked inside, seem to have even less open surface area.
So knowing what happens when the opening is further reduced would be of great value.
It might be that due to higher water column index Festool will outperform the Cobra at 1 1/5" hose or similar surface area opening.
Hard to believe that there is no proper comparison scale between such an expensive machines. Kind of like comparing cars using just raw horsepower.