guybo said:Hi, roughly 371x271x212 calculated by volume.I don't own one. guy
SRSemenza said:guybo said:Hi, roughly 371x271x212 calculated by volume.I don't own one. guy
[member=74579]Agent 73[/member]
This is not correct if you want the actual opening at the top as opposed to the amount of length and width down inside the box.
I do not have one to measure but I have had my hands on one. The top opening is about 25mm less on each long side and 15mm less on each short side / width. In other words about 246mm wide x 366 long. If the handle is folded you will lose about another 25mm on one long side and another 25mm on half of each short side. Leaving an opening of about 221mm x 311mm (on half, 366mm on other half).
Those numbers are guestimates. If you look at a picture you can see that the opening has a thick rim around it and then the handle folds inside the rim.
Seth
pixelated said:I have one. With the handle folded down, the opening is about 188x356 mm at the front, and 300mm wide under the handle. The handle is about 30mm in the area where you would grip it.
Vondawg said:* provided you are changing into the new systempixelated said:I’ve not used mine very much so far, but the folding handle seemed to be a nice improvement over the previous one, since it allows me to have another Systainer above it in a stack.
squall_line said:I'm not sure I understand; how does staying on TLoc affect moving to a Sys3 Toolbox, or vice/versa? The TLoc Toolbox was only capable of mating with a TLoc-generation ToolBox or TLoc-generation Storage Box on top of it because of the fixed handle and the weird mid-field flippy locks, but was capable of sitting atop a TLoc or OG systainer under it.
The Sys3 Toolbox should mate up with a standard TLoc under it or on top of it, or with an OG Flippy-Lock systainer under it. So the same as a TLoc-gen Systainer plus more?