fdengel said:Personally, I think there are some sensible aspects to this idea, though I don't really expect this.
While the whole thing is obviously a pure guess at this point, I could see it as making sense for Protool to become a separate division of Festool under a name like "Festool Industrial" (as was suggested earlier) or "Festool Elite" or some such strangeness, with the merger being to assist with distribution channels and the like, thus eliminating the stigma of having "Pro" in the name of the company (agreed that does make it sound cheap), provides a degree of name recognition to those less-in-the-know, etc.
Merging the color schemes would not be needed as this could still be considered a separate line of tools.
Ryobi tools are generally blue but some of them are green to distinguish a different line (just the first example of this that comes to mind)...
So to some degree there appears to be some potential in the idea, or at least in something like it.
ccarrolladams said:When did Festool USA change its mind and decide to exhibit at AWFS 2013 in Las Vegas in July?
I am registered and have my hotel room booked. The word I received from Festool was that they were skipping AWFS 2013 to concentrate of JLC 2013.
Rick Christopherson said:From the very beginning I had always felt this was an unfounded rumor for various reasons. Even in the "wishful thinking department" there are some logic flaws.
First off, consider how closely guarded secrets are within the organization, even for just a new product, let alone a major change such as this. A sales rep would not know about an organizational change such as this until it was already being implemented.
Then there is the wishful thinking:
If Protool is not available in the US or other countries, why would a name change be required to change that? It is the same infrastructure. If TTS wanted the product in a specific location, they would bring it there regardless what the sticker was on the side of the tool. Trademarks are not strong enough to prevent a product from being sold if the desire is there to do so. For example, simply prefixing the name with TTS-Protool would be sufficient.
If Protool is available in only 240 volts, why would a name change be required to change that? Or conversely, just because it gets a name change, why would it force other changes to go with it?
If Festool wanted any of the products branded under Protool to be available under Festool, they would have or could have already done that years ago. It wouldn't require a name merger to accomplish that.
Even though there could be legitimate business reasons for wanting a name-merger, none of them have been touched on in this discussion.
JoggleStick said:I reckon they will revamp the Cordless range...
Cordless Planer
Cordless Rotex
Cordless Domino
Cordless Kapex
Cordless TS55
Cordless Portaband...
The mind boggles...
Anyway that's my 'future view' through my 'beer goggles' : hic!
Deansocial said:Rick Christopherson said:From the very beginning I had always felt this was an unfounded rumor for various reasons. Even in the "wishful thinking department" there are some logic flaws.
First off, consider how closely guarded secrets are within the organization, even for just a new product, let alone a major change such as this. A sales rep would not know about an organizational change such as this until it was already being implemented.
Then there is the wishful thinking:
If Protool is not available in the US or other countries, why would a name change be required to change that? It is the same infrastructure. If TTS wanted the product in a specific location, they would bring it there regardless what the sticker was on the side of the tool. Trademarks are not strong enough to prevent a product from being sold if the desire is there to do so. For example, simply prefixing the name with TTS-Protool would be sufficient.
If Protool is available in only 240 volts, why would a name change be required to change that? Or conversely, just because it gets a name change, why would it force other changes to go with it?
If Festool wanted any of the products branded under Protool to be available under Festool, they would have or could have already done that years ago. It wouldn't require a name merger to accomplish that.
Even though there could be legitimate business reasons for wanting a name-merger, none of them have been touched on in this discussion.
Its funny how unfounded rumours turn around to be videos and such of a high percentage of the tool in about 10 days.
I remember a rumour that festool was going to make an impact driver and that idea got shot down too....
Bob Marino said:Hilti used to be sold at Home Depot. In my area they had a Hilti salesman there during normal work hours. If Festool did something like that it could be huge for sales.
Above written by Brice Burrell.
Brice,
We had the same situation here in NJ, but for whatever reason/reasons it has not worked out. HD sells Hilti, but there is no support other than store salespeople. As a dealer, I know there will come a day when we will see Festool/Protool in HD, BUT Festool takes a very, slooooooooooooooooooow and long term view of their USA market. They won't do that until they feel the time is right - the support must be there, or else the tools will collect dust as there won't be anyone to explain why they should buy a 500.00 + router rather than the 150.00 one. Now, that would hurt Festool's image!
My opinion...and it is only my opinion - with nothing from Festool USA to support it is that we will see PROTOOL being sold in the Home Depots, not Festool.
Bob