GreenGA said:
This is from the era when Craftsman meant something. [cool] This thing is a beast of a saw and runout, last time I checked was almost nonexistent.
harry_ said:
I have a similar dilemma, except that mine came from Montgomery-Ward.
Radial arm saws have a bad reputation due to the number of crappy ones out there, especially with Sears flooding the market with crappy model Craftsmans. I don't know if the original poster's Craftsman saw was made by DeWalt, but I do know that Harry's
was. If it has the Montgomery Ward name on it, then it is the old Powercraft from DeWalt. If the original poster's saw has a cast iron carriage, then it too is likely one of the old DeWalt saws.
These are hard to find, and you guys are talking about throwing them away? [scared]
When people say that a miter saw is better than a radial arm saw, they are drawing this conclusion because they are comparing a low-end radial arm saw to a high-end miter saw (or worse, have never bothered to calibrate either type). The difference between a good radial arm saw and any miter saw is the ability to calibrate all axis of motion to a very fine degree. With saws that are approaching 30, 40, 50 years old, you need to go through and adjust them to achieve their true potential. There are those that claim their radial arm saws won't hold their adjustment. Well that's because they didn't know there was more to adjust, such as the column gibs and carriage eccentric rollers.
Miter saws were created to be a portable version of a radial arm saw, so comparing the two is like comparing a cabinet tablesaw to a benchtop tablesaw.