I'm planning my holiday projects and those involve sanding down a couple of solid wood tables and benches for re-lacquering. I have a RO90 and an ETS150/3 but I'm not sure if I'll have a good time roughing up the old boat lacquer off the 12 sq.m. of surface with the ETS.
So I've been looking at my options for a suitable tool for the removal of old stuff and it seems, after a little chat with the local Festool rep, that my options would basically boil down to one of their belt sanders or an RO150. To my understanding the belt sanders with the sanding frame would produce a level tabletop and remove material very aggressively whereas the Rotex would require more from the user to get a flat surface with a hard pad. Then on the other hand my understanding is that a belt sander without the frame is about as hard to use tool as a sander can be.
Now the problem that I see with these choises is that the BS75 comes in a ginormous Maxi Systainer (hard to store) and costs about as much as the RO150 and is a one hit wonder in only doing level surfaces. On the other hand the RO150 requires some skill from the operator and at least theoretically could be used for other things like vaxing the cars and buffing if I've understood correctly.
How hard would you, who have done this kind of large surface sanding, rate using a RO150 to do the job vs. a belt sander?
Could a hobbyist keep a table straight with a Rotex and benefit from the secondary uses of the tool or should I look into a framed belt sander for this sort of thing just to be on the safe side?
And how much slower would the sanding be if I put something like 60 grit Granat on my ETS/3 and sand away with that instead of buying more tools? Would we be talking minutes/hours/days or difference?
So I've been looking at my options for a suitable tool for the removal of old stuff and it seems, after a little chat with the local Festool rep, that my options would basically boil down to one of their belt sanders or an RO150. To my understanding the belt sanders with the sanding frame would produce a level tabletop and remove material very aggressively whereas the Rotex would require more from the user to get a flat surface with a hard pad. Then on the other hand my understanding is that a belt sander without the frame is about as hard to use tool as a sander can be.
Now the problem that I see with these choises is that the BS75 comes in a ginormous Maxi Systainer (hard to store) and costs about as much as the RO150 and is a one hit wonder in only doing level surfaces. On the other hand the RO150 requires some skill from the operator and at least theoretically could be used for other things like vaxing the cars and buffing if I've understood correctly.
How hard would you, who have done this kind of large surface sanding, rate using a RO150 to do the job vs. a belt sander?
Could a hobbyist keep a table straight with a Rotex and benefit from the secondary uses of the tool or should I look into a framed belt sander for this sort of thing just to be on the safe side?
And how much slower would the sanding be if I put something like 60 grit Granat on my ETS/3 and sand away with that instead of buying more tools? Would we be talking minutes/hours/days or difference?