Sanding Hardwood Plywood

Holmz said:
SRSemenza said:
Personally I think that a belt sander , even with depth control frame, is just asking to sand through the veneer.

In general it just doesn't need much sanding.

Seth

It does seem counter intuitive.
Which is where some factual evidence is worthwhile. (which I do not have).

Hey Holmz, I wouldn’t let a belt sander get within 20’ of the veneered ply. The maple ply I’m using now has a veneer that is less than .020” thick, that is under .5mm. It doesn’t take much of a whoops moment to suffer a catastrophic result.

As others have said, the ply is very smooth in the as-purchased condition and only needs a quick “kiss and a promise” to prepare it for finishing. I own a RS 2 and I wouldn’t even consider breaking it out for sanding ply. The ETS EC or the Mirka of your choice would also be my choice. Maximum material removal is probably in the .001”-.002” range, likely much less than that. We’re not trying to remove planer blade marks.

However if you’re trying to remove an applied finish from the ply, then that’s a different story.
 
For 1/2 sheet sanders, IMHO the Makita BO4900v is the real value. Does a great job. Takes normal half sheet sandpaper, but also has velcro on the pad and the vacuum hole pattern exactly matches Festool 1/2 sheet paper. 

They normally run in the $165 to 185 range. Toolnut has it listed for 187 and there is a $25 off $100 or more promo running.
https://www.toolnut.com/makita-bo4900v-finishing-sander.html

Amazon has it for $170 without the promo available.
https://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO490...ie=UTF8&qid=1511302352&sr=8-1&keywords=makita+bo4900v

I've had one for more than 5 years and it's still going strong.

It does need a small adapter tube for the Festool hose since the dust port is slightly smaller than the Festool offerings. But you can get one at Home Depot.

I don't think that the Bosch will take the Festool paper, doesn't have the velcro.

Ron

 
Belt sanders with adjustable frames are rarer here in North American than rare.

Peter
 
Peter Halle said:
Belt sanders with adjustable frames are rarer here in North American than rare.

Peter

Rarer than rare is right.

I skipped this thread so far because the first two replies were right on the money.

I have three half sheet sanders.  A thirty year old Porter Cable, a Bosch, and most recently the RS2. I keep reading about how much people like them and I get suckered into buying another but I rarely use any of mine. IMO they're too slow. Part of the problem (I think) is that the platen is rarely flat so you're really only sanding with a fraction of that "half sheet".
 
Cheese said:
Holmz said:
SRSemenza said:
Personally I think that a belt sander , even with depth control frame, is just asking to sand through the veneer.

In general it just doesn't need much sanding.

Seth

It does seem counter intuitive.
Which is where some factual evidence is worthwhile. (which I do not have).

Hey Holmz, I wouldn’t let a belt sander get within 20’ of the veneered ply. The maple ply I’m using now has a veneer that is less than .020” thick, that is under .5mm. It doesn’t take much of a whoops moment to suffer a catastrophic result.

As others have said, the ply is very smooth in the as-purchased condition and only needs a quick “kiss and a promise” to prepare it for finishing. I own a RS 2 and I wouldn’t even consider breaking it out for sanding ply. The ETS EC or the Mirka of your choice would also be my choice. Maximum material removal is probably in the .001”-.002” range, likely much less than that. We’re not trying to remove planer blade marks.

However if you’re trying to remove an applied finish from the ply, then that’s a different story.

I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch. 
 
This is the European version of the Bosch Sander.  I don't know what the differences are, if any - but it's a pretty good video.  (I had the Porter Cable 1/2 sheet sander also 30 years ago, and I would say that the Bosch has come a loooooong way since  then)

Read some of the reviews on Amazon and note that the reviewers were not given the sander or paid for the endorsement like Festool used to like to do

reviews at the bottom of the page
 
Steven Owen said:
I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch.

Really?  I can't imagine wanting to use orbital over random orbital unless a delta or non-round pad is needed. I have always felt the swirl marks were more likely with orbital than random orbital. Interesting.

In any case when I use an ETS150/5 or /3 on thin veneer plywood (really thin) one pass with 180 does the job and no marks and no sanding through.

Seth
 
rvieceli said:
For 1/2 sheet sanders, IMHO the Makita BO4900v is the real value. Does a great job. Takes normal half sheet sandpaper, but also has velcro on the pad and the vacuum hole pattern exactly matches Festool 1/2 sheet paper. 

They normally run in the $165 to 185 range. Toolnut has it listed for 187 and there is a $25 off $100 or more promo running.
https://www.toolnut.com/makita-bo4900v-finishing-sander.html

Amazon has it for $170 without the promo available.
https://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO490...ie=UTF8&qid=1511302352&sr=8-1&keywords=makita+bo4900v

I've had one for more than 5 years and it's still going strong.

It does need a small adapter tube for the Festool hose since the dust port is slightly smaller than the Festool offerings. But you can get one at Home Depot.

I don't think that the Bosch will take the Festool paper, doesn't have the velcro.

Ron

FWIW, I am very happy with my Makita 1/2 sheet sander, too.  A real bargain.
 
I managed to sand through the veneer on walnut ply with an ets 150.  Maybe it was low quality ply, but although the plywood looked really flat to me it actually had high spots that burned right through.  Maybe a sander with a smaller or softer pad that would not try to flatten everything. I would not be confident using a belt sander. 
 
SRSemenza said:
Steven Owen said:
I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch.

Really?  I can't imagine wanting to use orbital over random orbital unless a delta or non-round pad is needed. I have always felt the swirl marks were more likely with orbital than random orbital. Interesting.

In any case when I use an ETS150/5 or /3 on thin veneer plywood (really thin) one pass with 180 does the job and no marks and no sanding through.

Seth

Hmmm, must be because you observe the results instead of going by what others say.

The big soft random swirls from a random orbit sander are much less apparent than the concise little eclipses of a simple orbital sander.

There should be some technical terms to distinguish the random orbits (a particular point on an abrasive disk takes) of an ETS sander from the repeating (Spirograph-like) orbits an RO sander in geared drive makes, but I don't know them.

I am familiar with the visible results and random orbit is way superior to orbital. I stopped using orbital whenever possible as soon as the Porter Cable RO came out thirty something years ago. I never bought another orbital sander until I got into the Festool lineup.
 
Mismarked said:
I managed to sand through the veneer on walnut ply with an ets 150.  Maybe it was low quality ply, but although the plywood looked really flat to me it actually had high spots that burned right through.  Maybe a sander with a smaller or softer pad that would not try to flatten everything. I would not be confident using a belt sander.

In that case a soft pad and a fine abrasive (180 or more) is about all you can do with a machine.

Hand sanding is a last resort.
 
SRSemenza said:
Steven Owen said:
I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch.

Really?  I can't imagine wanting to use orbital over random orbital unless a delta or non-round pad is needed. I have always felt the swirl marks were more likely with orbital than random orbital. Interesting.

In any case when I use an ETS150/5 or /3 on thin veneer plywood (really thin) one pass with 180 does the job and no marks and no sanding through.

Seth

I was thinking more about human error when sanding veneers.  The rectangular shape of larger sheet sanders force you to stay with the grain when sanding. 
 
Steven Owen said:
Steven Owen said:
I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch.
I was thinking more about human error when sanding veneers.  The rectangular shape of larger sheet sanders force you to stay with the grain when sanding.

Large 1/2 sheet sanders are great for keeping a large surface flat when you have a lot of resawing/planer marks to remove. However, when the surface is already flat they really don't offer any additional magic that any 125/150 sized ETS EC type sander can provide. Using fine grit papers, the dwell time over any specific spot is really minimal because the area is already flat and the surface is already relatively smooth. The veneered ply you're purchasing doesn't have a 40-80 grit surface finish, if it did you probably wouldn't purchase it in the first place.

Per the random orbital swirl mark observation, a random orbital sander in woodworking vernacular, is also known as a DA (dual action) sander in the automotive finish trade. I purchased my first pneumatic, National Detroit DA version in the late 60's or early 70's and still own it. The DA sander has been the go to sander for the automotive/motorcycle paint restoration business for the last 50+ years. As far as I know it may still be...unless laser surface treatment techniques suddenly became more popular when I walked away from the computer and took the dog for a walk.  If so...that'd be cool.  [cool]

What other, more highly defined surface, is offered to the general public than the painted surface of a new automobile?  Be it a Suburu or a Mercedes, what surface is smoother, has virtually no orange peel and exhibits no swirl marks than a new automobile?  These surfaces were probably prepped using DA sanders.

In wood working semantics we refer to them as "piano finishes" or "polished lacquer" finishes, when in reality we are really trying to replicate automotive type finishes on wooden materials.  [tongue]  And we are using random orbital sanders to produce that finish.

Whoops...I forgot to include these photos. Maple ply, purchased from the cheapest-of-the-cheap big boxes, Menards. Sanded with a ETS EC 125 wearing a 150 sized pad, using 240 Granat and finished with 3 coats of GF water based clear poly, hand sanded between coats with Festool 400 grit foam backed squares.   
 

Attachments

  • 4241.JPG
    4241.JPG
    1.9 MB · Views: 488
  • 4242.JPG
    4242.JPG
    2.1 MB · Views: 463
  • 4243.JPG
    4243.JPG
    2.1 MB · Views: 461
  • 4321.jpg
    4321.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 421
  • 4358.jpg
    4358.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 474
Cheese said:
Steven Owen said:
Steven Owen said:
I find it interesting you would consider using a random orbital on sheet plywood.  Most people reccomend orbital sheet sanders for the job.  My biggest concern with using a random orbital on such a thin veneer would be a higher potential for swirl marks even with a light touch.
I was thinking more about human error when sanding veneers.  The rectangular shape of larger sheet sanders force you to stay with the grain when sanding.

Large 1/2 sheet sanders are great for keeping a large surface flat when you have a lot of resawing/planer marks to remove. However, when the surface is already flat they really don't offer any additional magic that any 125/150 sized ETS EC type sander can provide. Using fine grit papers, the dwell time over any specific spot is really minimal because the area is already flat and the surface is already relatively smooth. The veneered ply you're purchasing doesn't have a 40-80 grit surface finish, if it did you probably wouldn't purchase it in the first place.

Per the random orbital swirl mark observation, a random orbital sander in woodworking vernacular, is also known as a DA (dual action) sander in the automotive finish trade. I purchased my first pneumatic, National Detroit DA version in the late 60's or early 70's and still own it. The DA sander has been the go to sander for the automotive/motorcycle paint restoration business for the last 50+ years. As far as I know it may still be...unless laser surface treatment techniques suddenly became more popular when I walked away from the computer and took the dog for a walk.  If so...that'd be cool.  [cool]

What other, more highly defined surface, is offered to the general public than the painted surface of a new automobile?  Be it a Suburu or a Mercedes, what surface is smoother, has virtually no orange peel and exhibits no swirl marks than a new automobile?  These surfaces were probably prepped using DA sanders.

In wood working semantics we refer to them as "piano finishes" or "polished lacquer" finishes, when in reality we are really trying to replicate automotive type finishes on wooden materials.  [tongue]  And we are using random orbital sanders to produce that finish.

Whoops...I forgot to include these photos. Maple ply, purchased from the cheapest-of-the-cheap big boxes, Menards. Sanded with a ETS EC 125 wearing a 150 sized pad, using 240 Granat and finished with 3 coats of GF water based clear poly, hand sanded between coats with Festool 400 grit foam backed squares. 

All good points.  I’ve always tried to understand the purpose of sheet sanders and where they fit in.  If you had a Rotex with a hard pad, would it not erase the need for sheet sander?

The goal many of us have with hardwood plywood is not making it look like it’s plywood for a laugh. You want to stain hardwood plywood to blend seamlessly with the solid wood elements in a product.  You don’t want the client to look at a finish thinking it looks like plywood.

 
Cheese said:
Holmz said:
SRSemenza said:
Personally I think that a belt sander , even with depth control frame, is just asking to sand through the veneer.

In general it just doesn't need much sanding.

Seth

It does seem counter intuitive.
Which is where some factual evidence is worthwhile. (which I do not have).

Hey Holmz, I wouldn’t let a belt sander get within 20’ of the veneered ply. The maple ply I’m using now has a veneer that is less than .020” thick, that is under .5mm. It doesn’t take much of a whoops moment to suffer a catastrophic result.

As others have said, the ply is very smooth in the as-purchased condition and only needs a quick “kiss and a promise” to prepare it for finishing. I own a RS 2 and I wouldn’t even consider breaking it out for sanding ply. The ETS EC or the Mirka of your choice would also be my choice. Maximum material removal is probably in the .001”-.002” range, likely much less than that. We’re not trying to remove planer blade marks.

However if you’re trying to remove an applied finish from the ply, then that’s a different story.

Well how is plywood made?
And how are veneers made? and how are their surfaces prepared?
Whether or not knowing that has any bearing, I am not sure.

As the frame can be adjust to not even touch the belt to the wood means that the only place for possible trouble is at the edges.

Steven Owen said:
...
All good points.  I’ve always tried to understand the purpose of sheet sanders and where they fit in.  If you had a Rotex with a hard pad, would it not erase the need for sheet sander?
....

A >4" by >8" surface with the mass over the top of it... is less prone to wavyness than a5" circle with a handle hanging off the back.

I will often use 80 or 120 to flatten with a 1\2-sheet, and then bust out the DEROS (180/240) to make it smooth when on solid wood .
 
Mismarked said:
I managed to sand through the veneer on walnut ply with an ets 150.  Maybe it was low quality ply, but although the plywood looked really flat to me it actually had high spots that burned right through.  Maybe a sander with a smaller or softer pad that would not try to flatten everything. I would not be confident using a belt sander.

Here are the hand sanding block products I like to use, particularly between coats of finish.  No electricity required, other than what is needed to run my CT26.  It also helps that I own the correct size sandpaper for these tools:

Festool 496963 115mm X 226mm Hand Sanding Blockhttp://www.bobmarinosbesttools.com/hand-sanding-block-115mm-x-226mm/p/496963/

Festool 496962 80mm X 130mm Hand Sanding Blockhttps://www.festoolproducts.com/festool-496962-hand-sanding-block-80mm-x-130mm.html

Festool 495019 Hose HSK D21.5 5mhttps://www.festoolproducts.com/festool-495019-hose-hsk-d21-5-5m.html

Festool 498527 Plastic Universal Brush Nozzlehttps://www.festoolproducts.com/festool-498527-universal-brush-nozzle.html
 
Steven Owen said:
SRSemenza said:
Personally I think that a belt sander , even with depth control frame, is just asking to sand through the veneer.

In general it just doesn't need much sanding.

Seth

I’d also think increase caution in handling and storing the plywood plays Big roll too.  I was thinking of keeping a roll of thin packing styrofoam to protect the sheets to prevent adding problems and scratches through mishandling.

If I plan to make a side business building wall mounted TV stands, I have to consider clever ways of reducing the weight for wall mounting to make the stand easier to lift and mount.  A combination of solid hardwood top and Hardwood plywood seems the way to go. 

I wonder how restistant an MDF core would be to warping under wieght.  High end audio equipment can add 250-400 lbs to a stand depending the set-up. MDF on it’s own can warp when a heavy load is not balanced well.  You see MDF warps in around the lift system Router tables all the time when the MDF cannot be reinforced.

In my experience building custom units for the last 15 years proper design and construction methods are essential when using any material. Any veneer with a core material will sag whether its hardwood or not. For what you just said about the units you're going to build off the shelf material is going to be disappointing. Custom laid veneers matched to the hardwood components on an FX, classic or MDF sandwich core would give the best results. Again in my experience your goto sander would be something with similar specs to an ETS 150/3, its an easy to use relatively light unit that does not give swirls if used properly.
 
Back
Top