- Joined
- Nov 3, 2007
- Messages
- 5,133
I think you nailed a few things, Ken.
One of the advantages of a thinner kerf is it allows smaller engines to dig the trough, so to speak...
The biggest disadvantage I see is that the blade can, potentially, be less stiff, but that assumes that the plate is similarly reduced. I don't know if that's the case here. I'll have to check. Even if it is, there are ways to account for thickness.
If you look at how the Panther was not just reduced but the whole blade engineering changed, I think it bodes well.
I know that there are always advances in technology - materials, analytical/engineering, and manufacturing. So to think that a blade with several year old technology is "cutting edge" (yes that's a pun), seems specious. I, for one, am glad that Festool embraces the latest.
Tom
One of the advantages of a thinner kerf is it allows smaller engines to dig the trough, so to speak...
The biggest disadvantage I see is that the blade can, potentially, be less stiff, but that assumes that the plate is similarly reduced. I don't know if that's the case here. I'll have to check. Even if it is, there are ways to account for thickness.
If you look at how the Panther was not just reduced but the whole blade engineering changed, I think it bodes well.
I know that there are always advances in technology - materials, analytical/engineering, and manufacturing. So to think that a blade with several year old technology is "cutting edge" (yes that's a pun), seems specious. I, for one, am glad that Festool embraces the latest.
Tom