Rick Christopherson said:I am not entirely positive about this next statement, so don't quote it as gospel. I believe that the worst scenario you could have would be to have antistatic hoses between the DD and the vac, and between the DD and tool. In this situation, both hoses will be doing their jobs for their areas, but the DD becomes a "charge bottleneck", and all the difference in charge will be concentrated to a smaller area. It will build up until it can rapidly discharge.
Again, I am not totally positive about this, but if you used non-antistatic hoses, the charge would be spread out across a longer distance. You would be less likely to have a rapid discharge of high magnitude. That doesn't mean you wouldn't have any discharges, but they would be smaller and not necessarily directly coupled to the vac. But of course, this means you would have more nuisance shocks for the operator.
I can follow that logic.
I just need to find better way to discharge that energy before it gets to the vacuum. They do sell a metal cyclone which I think would be beneficial but its pretty expensive. But less than a Festool motor module !