Guy, that was my original thought. I will talk to my metal supplier and see what they say. My gut says it would flex too much.
windmill man said:
Think you may be better with a bit of box section or angle if you have the depth of section to hide it.
Not sure I understand "a bit of box section or angle" do you mean box steel and/or angle bracket?
Sal @ Theshipstore said:
What's your thinking on the thickness of the steel. I would think something like 3/8" might be good encased in a wooden box frame going from edge to edge.
Yes, 3/8" would be maximum width I think. I have not discussed this with the supplier who would weld the frame .
tallgrass said:
my advice is to build one, load it and measure deflection. this is all about cross sectional area of your shelf.
I believe that is how I will approach this. If the client agrees the the price I will build a prototype all wooden and then stand on it. I am 225 lbs. Should be good if it can support my weight.
davee said:
If you use steel, you'll want the steel on the outside surfaces, not the inside.
The client doesn't want to see the steel but I could put a thin veneer on it if it's the outside edges.
davee said:
JMB's approach is better where the steel more in the vertical position.
Really, you are going to give JMB way too much confidence here! [tongue] One of my first thoughts was a version of JMB solution. I was only thinking of two bars vs. his 4-5. I was worried about lateral torsion but because the shelf is fixed to both sides of the cabinet it shouldn't twist.
davee said:
A torsion box works well, but you need thickness to make it effective.
Isn't thickness relative or is that what you mean...the shelf is too thin to the length to be effective as a torsion box. Aren't airplane wings large tapered torsion boxes?
jmbfestool said:
I thought of this (sketchup below) but its getting something like this made and I thought my idea above was the easiest and quickest cheapest but still give alot of strength to the shelve.
So my idea above just having upright inside your wood allows you to keep your shelve as thin as possible but allowing you to have your upright as wide as possible.
Thanks JMB, I think your concept would be easier to fabricate (cheaper for the client) than my original concept. Based on tallgrass and davees vote of confidence, I should probably mock this up and test. I promise not to post any video of my jumping up and down on it though! [wink]
Upscale said:
Without a support of some type, I'd be wary of it sagging. It if was mine to build, I'd have the second self with a face frame of two inches and a piece of angle iron behind it. Of course, to make the entire unit look proportional, you'd then have to make the sides, top and bottom appear to be 2" thick also and quite possibly the wood surrounding the TV as well.
I agree completely. The client insists on 1" thick shelves, and sides. The client is copying a design he currently has but he is moving to a new house and wants the same thing. I think the problem presented (shelf) is quite interesting and if he is willing to pay to achieve his goal we both win.
pugilato said:
Putting the heaviest item on the weakest shelf is non-sensical.
I know you mean this in the kindest way [smile]. It's different I'll say that.
pugilato said:
I still think that a deep dado on the backboard, in conjuction with dados on the vertical supports on either side of the shelf, and a support on the front of the shelf will do you right.
The back is going to be a maximum of 1/2" probably 1/4". So no dado there. I would have to use blind dadoes on the vertical supports as he doesn't want to see a break in the vertical line. That would be ok, as long it was the only thing I had to do. As I stated earlier a support on the front would have to be hidden, but it is doable and not something I had considered.
pugilato said:
Another warning sign is the client's insistence on using wood (not plywood). I dont know if I would personally take on this job without covering my arse with a significant amount of paper.
Yes, noted. Lots of Green paper too.
Tim