PaulMarcel said:
So mine is the "Laguna 'Italian-Made' 18" which is a relabeled ACM. I looked yours up and other than the on/off buttons, everything is identical to mine though yours looks to be 20". I had to drill holes in my table as well but the mounts were swinging arms so it was easy to set the height and placement. Yours looks like vertical slots. I could see that being less forgiving.
Mine's actually the 540 (22"). I got that one because the resaw capacity matched my MiniMax FS 350 Jointer/Planer.
PaulMarcel said:
I, too, bought that tension meter off eBay. It is holding down some papers in a nice blue box. "Someday".
If you do dust that tension meter off, I'd be interested in your results. My bandsaw has had the tension removed every night, except maybe once for one overnight, so I was surprised that my preliminary results were that I wasn't measuring the tension I should have.
I ended up using Snodgrass's "open the top cabinet and push the blade at the bottom of the cabinet to left. About a ¼" without getting white finger is the right tension" method. I know the Wood Slicer claims to run better at slightly higher blade tensions, and since my blade is so long overall (165"), I figured higher tension might be needed anyway to not deflect over the larger resaw span. I'm running the saw at the 20mm setting for the 13mm blade width and getting good results, but am worried what happens when I put a ¾" and 1" blade on the saw. Capacity is supposed to be at least 35mm on this saw.
I tried something new recently, too. I made a new batch of elephant rattles (my wife's design), where I resaw a 18mm board, cut out the shape and a recess for a couple of pennies, then glue back up to get about a 16mm thick rattle. Previously I had lightly sanded the resawn surfaces to get them flat and smooth for the glue, but after my most recent resawing it looked like the slight irregularities of one surface meshed with the other side, so I just glued them back together (with a lot of pressure). The result was a better grain match.
One other thing I found interesting is perpendicularness. Snodgrass's check is to cut partially into a 2x6" (not resaw), and then flip the board around to put the blade in from the back. If it slides in the table is perpendicular to the blade. In my case, it slides it with no perceivable deflection, but with my resaw fence adjusted to be 90º to the table with a good (and good sized) square with strong backlight, I found about 0.35 mm difference between top and bottom of the resaw. So, the slightly wider kerf than blade allows for some minor inaccuracies. I need to re-adjust my table that tinyest amount, but in the meantime I just adjusted the fence to be parallel to the blade since that was now so much easier with the new fence, and now getting uniform thicknesses within about 0.15mm to 0.2mm across 7", which I think is pretty good.