Corwin said:
Hey Dan,
I can remember when someone referred to you as a hobbyist, and you objected, stating that all the remodeling you were doing didn't feel like a hobby. And I know that you put a lot of consideration into your tool purchases to perform your "hobby" work. I'm sure you wouldn't chose a poor quality tool because you are "just" a do-it-youselfer. I'm not sure what point you are attempting to instill upon me with your post above, as I do understand all of those considerations. But, to be clear, the point of my posts here is that whether labeled a "professional" or "hobbyist" one of the considerations we all make in selecting our tools is for their ability to perform the tasks at hand. And it is not just the "professional" that needs the bigger, tougher more industrial quality tool as suggested in John's post.
Corwin,
I wasn't disagreeing with your point or saying that a pro needs a bigger, tougher, more industrial tool more that an amateur. I was simply indicating that a pro has to consider profit when making tool purchase, while an amateur does not.
Regarding me... While I'm an amateur in my remodeling efforts, I choose better tools based on preference most of the time. However, there is a profit motive to some extent.
Unlike most pros, I'm less concerned about buying tools that will work all day, every day. OTOH, a tool needs to perform it's function well and consistently because I haven't much extra time and energy available. If it eats into my personal time, that's one thing. However, if the wrong or poor quality tool wastes so much time that it eats into my professional time, then it's cutting into my income. At that point, I start acting like a trade professional and my purchase decisions become based more on what is profitable and less on personal preference.
This was the driving force behind my purchase of a Kapex and getting rid of my Makita LS1016. I could accept hassling with the LS1016's runout issue with my first one, but I couldn't accept the runout issue with the second LS1016. Even though I didn't want to spend twice as much to buy a Kapex, I was wasting so much time with the Makita's issues that it cut into my work time. In other words, I couldn't afford to spend any more time on the Makita and decided that the Kapex was a more cost-effective purchase. (Yes, I wanted a Kapex. But "wanting" was not a good enough reason to buy one. When not having one indirectly affected my income,
that was a good reason to buy the Kapex.)
Regarding the Multimaster versus the Supercut, both are high-quality, professional-level tools IMO. "Professional-level" in this context means that they can produce high quality results when used correctly and can stand up to heavy usage. It does NOT mean they are meant only for professionals.
I'm very happy with my Multimaster. While there have been a few times that I wished that I had a Supercut, but for me it would be overkill. OTOH, if I was doing enough work where the extra power of the Supercut would make a difference in my income, I'd buy one in a flash. Simple as that.
Here's an interesting thread on JLC about the MM vs the SC:
http://forums.jlconline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47804 . Check out post #3, where this fellow mentioned a discussion with a Fein salesman:
The Fein salesman told us that realistically the Supercut is unnecessary for residential construction and the extra power becomes useful for commercial window guys who need to remove those fat butyl caulking beads.
Regards,
Dan.