jmbfestool
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,646
Haven't made the birch part yet going to do that now Ill be back!
neeleman said:Just put some Ø20 mm holes in it and you have your one CTL-MFT version.
And watch out otherwise Festool will copy it without letting you know.
sae said:And add the cleats for the systainers too?
Scott B. said:I almost think this point has been made abundantly clear.
Anyone interested in a thread to see if we can get a Syslite to break?
[blink]
jnug said:Maybe this is just a chink in their armor. They make fabulous tools.....close to the top of the food chain for quality but not nearly as expensive as some can be even as expensive as Festool is. but their not Gods over there. Maybe this vac stuff is just not a strong point for them. What a shock if that were the case. Can't think of hardly anything farther away from a track saw than a shop vac.
SRSemenza said:Lets take it easy, and not resort to a back and forth between members.
Seth
Scott B. said:SRSemenza said:Lets take it easy, and not resort to a back and forth between members.
Seth
When a thread has 113 posts and 39 of them are by the same person complaining about the same thing...my goodness, it would be difficult not to find ones self engaged in discussion with said member.
Also, can someone pull up Peter's tutorial on how to use thumbnail pics in posts? This thread could be reduced to 2 pages.
It's just inefficient.
[big grin]
EDIT> fixed quote box.
Scott B. said:That's my impression. It sounds like you are embracing this as an opportunity to "blame" Festool. Odd word choice, but anyway...
I think most of us realize that the plastic could be more robust. Festool is not some evil empire. It is a collection of good people committed to the singular goal of building the best tools.
I guess you can feel free to scream it from the roof tops, but conserve some energy. Its not exactly a newsflash discovery.
And, it does get to the point of clogging up the stream of threads on the forum when the same critique is stated repetitively. Sometimes, the argument can be perceived as losing merit when it appears to be more emotional than constructive.
It is fashionable sometimes, and a bit of a thrill, to find the "chink in the armor", but I think everyone heard it twice the first time.
Taking an "I'll show you" approach isn't always the best way. Anyone can point out a problem. Finding a solution is more of an art. In this case, the solution is pretty simple. It may just take a minute before the next generation of CT's rolls out. Meanwhile, if plywood works best for you, plywood it all day long and use it.
Just my opinion...as you were.
Scott B. said:SRSemenza said:Lets take it easy, and not resort to a back and forth between members.
Seth
When a thread has 113 posts and 39 of them are by the same person complaining about the same thing...my goodness, it would be difficult not to find ones self engaged in discussion with said member.
Also, can someone pull up Peter's tutorial on how to use thumbnail pics in posts? This thread could be reduced to 2 pages.
It's just inefficient.
[big grin]
EDIT> fixed quote box.
Scott B. said:SRSemenza said:Lets take it easy, and not resort to a back and forth between members.
Seth
When a thread has 113 posts and 39 of them are by the same person complaining about the same thing...my goodness, it would be difficult not to find ones self engaged in discussion with said member.
Also, can someone pull up Peter's tutorial on how to use thumbnail pics in posts? This thread could be reduced to 2 pages.
It's just inefficient.
[big grin]
EDIT> fixed quote box.
SRSemenza said:Scott B. said:SRSemenza said:Lets take it easy, and not resort to a back and forth between members.
Seth
When a thread has 113 posts and 39 of them are by the same person complaining about the same thing...my goodness, it would be difficult not to find ones self engaged in discussion with said member.
Also, can someone pull up Peter's tutorial on how to use thumbnail pics in posts? This thread could be reduced to 2 pages.
It's just inefficient.
[big grin]
EDIT> fixed quote box.
Poor choice of words on my part. It is not the discussion, it is the part that appears to headed down a personal road on the back and forth.
Seth