Domino Face Mortising Jig - Any Interest?

I built a V2 of the jig today:
[attachimg=1]

Changes from the previous version:
• Base plate is larger (200mm square)
• Built-in foot to hold the Domino vertically square
• Alignment marks cut with 20º Vee bit on bottom and edges
• Left-Right indexing adjustable via small brass screws

Here's a head on shot (POV of the face being mortised):
[attachimg=2]

Here's how you align it - same as before except now there's enough plate to clamp:
[attachimg=3]

The horizontal (left-right) and indexing turned out to be an issue, in terms of making this to fit more than just my particular instance. If you look closely at the base/fence sides, turns out they're not milled to be in the same plane at all. Even the bottom of the base protrudes a bit from the milled area, and both of those are different from the actual fence that rotates 90º:
[attachimg=4]

As you can see, I ended up cementing a piece of plexi with a small brass screw in it. That screw head registers against the portion of the base that's milled for the fixed 15mm height (10mm on the DF500), which is recessed from the bottom of the base as well as from the swinging fence portion. I had to size and position the block to not obscure the domino centerline. Here's the other side:
[attachimg=5]

As best I can determine, this is the most accurate way to index the cutter. The distance is 131mm on the DF700, btw. The use of screws lets you adjust not only dead center, but how tight the Domino fits in the jig. Because of the base protrusions, you have the slide the Domino in perpendicular to the face/jig, not slide it along the jig base plate.

Also relevant is that the bottom base (the plate with the two threaded holes) also isn't all at the same level. The main part, with the center and paddle centerlines, sticks out a tiny bit more than the sides do. And since those centerlines are very accurate, I decided to index the built-in foot against only that part of the base - so making it slightly less wide (only 119mm) than the whole base (which is well over 120mm)

Finally, I cut the alignment marks with a narrow 20º Vee bit and didn't see the need to ink fill them. They're cut on the bottom only, so parallax is practically nothing. And cutting alignment marks on the edges as well is a big help. A raking light into the jig's sides makes those marks stand out quite clearly, btw.

These changes make the jig more stable and less complicated to use (no external foot needed), as well as accommodated small variations in fence assembly size, in case Festool manufacturing over the years has changed slightly.

I don't have a DF500, but the main change would be that the foot is located 10mm off the horizontal centerline instead of 15mm. I think the fence/base widths are the same. If someone has a DF500 and can confirm:

• Width of bottom of base excluding the cast sides is 119mm
• Width between the milled areas that show the 10mm centerline is 131mm
• I will also need the distance off the centerline (or off the base bottom) for where the screwheads should go. On the DF700 there is 15mm of area there, but the DF500 should have only 10mm, with the bottom few mm sticking out more and appearing rough. So I would assume that putting the head such that it doesn't go beyond 10mm, but is very close, is the best location.

I've also decided to stick with the nominal ¼" plexiglass. That measures 5.5mm in thickness, which I think is absolutely fine for face mortising where going too deep would be really bad, so ½ mm less deep is actually a feature, especially if other Dominos are like mine and cut almost a mm deeper than the depth setting. I think anything less than 5.7mm thick but at least 5mm would be fine.

In terms of manufacturing (should I go that route), I think the process would be to cut a 200mm square blank on the CNC to ensure squareness, then rout the alignment Vee grooves, then flip over and rout shallow dados for the foot assembly to ensure alignment. I'd still need to rout the alignment marks on the sides by hand (router table probably) and then cut and assemble the foot assembly, then glue up. Instead of gluing the foot assembly in place, perhaps pre-drilling for screws on the CNC would be less stressful than the glue-up. Thoughts anyone?

I built this prototype with a tablesaw, 5-cut tweaked cross-cut sled, and router table. Both tablesaw and router table have fence DROs. I struggled a bit with the foot assembly since I didn't do the dado thing for alignment, but that operation probably needs the CNC or router table/template jigging to be accurate and repeatable.
 

Attachments

  • JigV2 Overview 2.jpg
    JigV2 Overview 2.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 496
  • HeadOn Shot.jpg
    HeadOn Shot.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 494
  • InUse.jpg
    InUse.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 494
  • Horiz Indexing2.jpg
    Horiz Indexing2.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 493
  • Horiz Indexing.jpg
    Horiz Indexing.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 491
Looks like a fully functional jig! I like the generous size and the fact that it’s (will be?) square.

Not having used a jig like this I’m not fully cognizant of the nuances so I’ll just add the comments that occurred while looking at the photos.

I would like the center of the mortise to be full millimeters from the four hard edges of the jig (so a square base is best). Mortise evenly spaced left and right and offset front/back of course.

It’s hard to tell the size of the inscribed lines but I prefer them to be as fine as possible. Often my handmade alignment lines are off a little and I can compensate if the thing I need to register to my line has fine enough markings. Maybe scratch the lines instead of route? Maybe a stouter engraving bit like a 60 * triangular bit that just barely contacts the stock, maybe with the motor off.

I worry about the little brass wood screws breaking acrylic. Polycarbonate can take that kind of stress but acrylic is much more brittle. Maybe little machine screws instead?

The photo showing the front of the machine through the transparent base makes the machine look cocked compared to the inscribed lines. Maybe the limits of the machine assembly? Or maybe the parts of the jig that position the machine should be together on one assembly that is adjustably attached to the inscribed base. My 500 machine is one of those that makes the mortise slightly out of parallel to the machine’s base but not so off that I’ve felt the need to do something about it. So maybe my comments above don’t count.

I’ll get out my Domino in a little while and take measurements for you. I’t will be interesting to see if my very early machine with pins is the same as the later paddle versions.
 
I think these are the dimensions you want.

Base width overall 132mm, 62mm to centerline

The shoulder at the side of the base is 10mm high right at the front of the machine but quickly recedes to 11mm for 13.5mm from the front, ending where the dovetail opening to host the side stops begins.

The stainless steel plate (which has the centerline) that is set into the broad flat in the cast base is 116mm wide.

[attachimg=1]

 

Attachments

  • Domino Base Dims.png
    Domino Base Dims.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 454
Michael Kellough said:
I would like the center of the mortise to be full millimeters from the four hard edges of the jig (so a square base is best). Mortise evenly spaced left and right and offset front/back of course.
Yes, on square and evenly spaced. I'm not sure that "full millimeters" matters - I don't think one really wants to measure off the base and apply an offset to get the mortise centerlines. The whole point of the jig is that you can directly see where you've marked the centerlines on the stock to be mortised. I could add a line coinciding with the base of the Domino since that's often a reference line used in some constructions (There actually is one in the V2 jig, but scribed on the other side for foot alignment).

Michael Kellough said:
It’s hard to tell the size of the inscribed lines but I prefer them to be as fine as possible.
It's a trade-off between being super fine and then having the inevitable scratches confuse things. In some lighting conditions my relatively lightly used DF700's bottom lines are hard to see. In my view, the 20º bit keeps the lines narrow while allowing them to be deep enough to last. I don't think it's common to scribe knife/marking guage lines on the face of stock to be dominoed, so the current scribes work well against a thin (0.5mm) pencil line.

Michael Kellough said:
I worry about the little brass wood screws breaking acrylic. Polycarbonate can take that kind of stress but acrylic is much more brittle. Maybe little machine screws instead?
Yeah, I wasn't happy with the brass flat head screws, but it's what I had lying around in a small enough size (#2 screw). I'll see what I can find in terms of small machine bolts, probably McMaster.

I could make the jig out of Lexan (polycarbonate) if people think that's a better material. Usually I think of polycarbonate for impact resistance (router table see-thru guards, goggles, etc.), but I don't think it's harder to work, so could use that instead.

Michael Kellough said:
The photo showing the front of the machine through the transparent base makes the machine look cocked compared to the inscribed lines.
That's simply a function of parallax since I didn't place the camera perfectly head-on and dead center with the mortise center. Remember, the alignment marks are scribed on the bottom of the plate, which a bit more than 5mm from the other side, where the Domino attaches. The scribes are dead-on, and having the scribed lines on the bottom of the plate is what reduces parallax to practically zero in use, since that's the surface against the stock.

Thanks for the dimensions. Interesting that the stainless steel part of base plate is 116mm versus my DF700's 118mm. I can standardize on the 116mm dimension (or maybe just do 114mm for tolerance) for both.

On your photo, which I've marked up here:
[attachimg=1]
1) First, just confirming that the green line has a slight offset from the stainless steel part to the cast aluminum part of the base, with the SS part protruding just slightly.

2) The yellow area I shaded in - is that perfectly flat with the rest of the area? On my DF700 it's a bit rough and sticks out more, which is why I had to avoid referencing against that. And can you give me dimensions of that?

3) I drew a blue line on half the circle and then the top of the machined area behind the 10mm flat reference. Could you measure from the bottom of the base to the lowest point on the circle? Looks to be around 6.5mm give or take to the circle, and then the straight part behind it about 8mm.

The flat area, excluding the yellow section, is what the jig should reference against.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • DF500.jpg
    DF500.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 439
As a side-note, Carbide 3D just released a video on making a walnut chair on one their bigger consumer CNCs. He programmed it to cut the face mortises with an 1/8" router bit exactly where they needed to be. And then with a narrow bit, cut alignment marks for the manual edge domino mortises using his DF500 (marks on bottom of chair, btw).

So, $5K CNC instead of a plastic jig?  [embarassed]

I really like my small Shapeoko, but I'm not yet good enough at programming it (I use Fusion360) to make it worthwhile for some complicated one-off projects. When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and when you have a CNC, everything looks like it can get routed with an end mill, I guess.

 
Sorry for the delay. Here are the dimensions of the shoulder of my early Domino.

[attachimg=1]

The shoulder on the other side does not have the dip.
 

Attachments

  • Domino Shoulder Dims.jpg
    Domino Shoulder Dims.jpg
    669.6 KB · Views: 398
Forgot to check your questions again.

“1) First, just confirming that the green line has a slight offset from the stainless steel part to the cast aluminum part of the base, with the SS part protruding just slightly.

Yes

2) The yellow area I shaded in - is that perfectly flat with the rest of the area? On my DF700 it's a bit rough and sticks out more, which is why I had to avoid referencing against that. And can you give me dimensions of that?

No it isn’t completely flat but I would not have a problem filing it flat.

3) I drew a blue line on half the circle and then the top of the machined area behind the 10mm flat reference. Could you measure from the bottom of the base to the lowest point on the circle? Looks to be around 6.5mm give or take to the circle, and then the straight part behind it about 8mm.

It’s just a little less than 6.5 but the shoulder on the other side does not have a dip and is 7mm+.

The flat area, excluding the yellow section, is what the jig should reference against.
 
Michael Kellough said:
Sorry for the delay. Here are the dimensions of the shoulder of my early Domino.

You sure about those? What you have marked as "11mm" should be exactly 10mm to correspond to the mortise centerlines.

Michael Kellough said:
The shoulder on the other side does not have the dip.

Any chance I could get new photos? Maybe the the Domino on its base - one dead on from the front and then one from each side? I'm a bit weirded out by the asymmetry...

 
Sorry for the misdirection from an erroneous measurement. Of course it's 10mm.
The error is a combination of misreading the closest caliper to hand and not thinking.

[attachimg=1]

I saw the that the caliper was on the next increment over from the 1 (which my feeble brain knew was really 10) and thought "11".

In reality it's 9.95mm. the other side is 10.05mm.

I'll go ahead and send the photos shortly.
 

Attachments

  • 10mm.jpg
    10mm.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 367
Peter Millard just released a video where he has to do face mortises and goes through what I think is a somewhat complicated process for alignment, creating a one-time blue tape jig:
=ZLRZvYMiZSDB1amt&t=566

(cued to a starting point for the face mortises)

The wrinkle here (as he discusses in the video) is that he decided to have the mortises in line with the angled upright. That meant he cut the edge mortises before beveling the upright's ends and needed that funky setup to cut angled face mortises.

Obviously, my V2 jig wouldn't work for the angled face mortises since it has the 90º support built-in. A variant of my V1 jig would work, but unless you're making lots of these probably not worth the time/effort/material to make it.

One question I have is whether his choice to angle the domino mortises is what you would have done?
 
No, I wouldn't angle the mortises and complicate things unnecessarily. I'd simply mill perpendicular mortises on all mating pieces.

While his angle alignment approach may be suitable in some cases, it wasn't necessary in that particular project.
 
He said the main reason was clamping simplicity. That with the dominos in alignment with the "vertical" connecting member, he could simply apply pressure along it.

But, then he had to make angled clamping cauls, and sandpaper one side to get that to work. So, to my mind, he's having to jig up to make the mortises, and then jigging to clamp. True, to clamp the 90º face mortise construction you'd probably end up with two clamps at each end, and having to balance the pressure between them to keep the top and bottom parallel.

For a one-off table, I think his choices were poor, but for production of several/many, maybe not so. I wonder about strength.
 
I haven't watched the clamping part of the video, but I don't find designing and making clamping cauls a particular challenge. Here the mortises could just be perpendicular in the mating pieces (the clamping block was held onto the workpiece with a couple drops of CA glue):

[attachimg=1]
 

Attachments

  • angled clamping.JPG
    angled clamping.JPG
    39.6 KB · Views: 218
An old Sedge video where he describes how to face mortise to the centerlines of a cross:=P8UxKzonvDummcU_&t=246

[attachimg=1]

Works because of the large face area, which as discussed above, isn't always there. The suggestions to add boards on the side to extend are OK, but I think this jig is better/easier. One thing I need to work out is some kind of rubber "feet" as the jig's plastic slides around pretty easily if not clamped down, and I can imagine people not wanting to take the time to do that (or in some cases that might be really hard to do).
 

Attachments

  • FaceMortise.jpg
    FaceMortise.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 161
smorgasbord said:
snip. The suggestions to add boards on the side to extend are OK, but I think this jig is better/easier. Snip.
Unless I'm missing something, in my case (reply#2) where the workpieces were so smaller (narrower) than the base of the domino machine, extending the lines on adjacent spacers/boards was the only way to position (and stabilize/balance) the machine. No?
 
ChuckS said:
Unless I'm missing something, in my case (reply#2) where the workpieces were so smaller (narrower) than the base of the domino machine, extending the lines on adjacent spacers/boards was the only way to position (and stabilize/balance) the machine. No?

Positioning with my jig would be a piece of cake.
For support, your board was long enough that the jig could be clamped to it, and then the jig provides a lot of support.

If I decide to make these I guess I need a demo video.
 
Here's a link to a video I found where someone made a non-transparent domino face jig for a specific purpose.

 
Back
Top