Even airlines are converting to metric

They got it wrong - this is just 'Mil (as in Military) time, not metric time. Metric time divides the day into 10 equal segments.

And no, I didn't forget the date.

:-)
 
Yes, I know this was an April Fools joke. I am reviving it because I learned something new that I wanted to pass on, and give a playful poke to our Metric pals across the pond:

I have a friend working in europe on aircraft and they use mostly SAE tools. Stahlwille and gedore have aviation sets that are almost all sae with very little metric.

And, of course, NASA is SAE.

Sure Airbus will have a FEW metric fasteners, but the standard for aviation has been set and it is SAE. Aviation requires standardization especially in commercial aircraft. Many carriers use contract operations to handle major inspections, these shops handle Airbus, Boeing, Embraer etc... and are located around the world. Lots and lots of money has been dumped into the testing and approval of aircraft fasteners, connectors, lines, hoses, and fittings. There is no such thing as a simple change. So SAE it is...

I'm sure there are manufacturers outside of the U.S. that is use metric, but there are no metric fasteners (that I'm aware of) that meet the federal code for use in aircraft.

So, you guys who where proudly proclaiming that nothing in your country is anything but Metric, ask a friend who works in Aviation what's in their toolbox and report back, OK? And the next time you fly, remember that it's SAE fasteners getting you safely to your destination.

[big grin] [poke]
 
wow said:
Yes, I know this was an April Fools joke. I am reviving it because I learned something new that I wanted to pass on, and give a playful poke to our Metric pals across the pond:

I have a friend working in europe on aircraft and they use mostly SAE tools. Stahlwille and gedore have aviation sets that are almost all sae with very little metric.

And, of course, NASA is SAE.

Sure Airbus will have a FEW metric fasteners, but the standard for aviation has been set and it is SAE. Aviation requires standardization especially in commercial aircraft. Many carriers use contract operations to handle major inspections, these shops handle Airbus, Boeing, Embraer etc... and are located around the world. Lots and lots of money has been dumped into the testing and approval of aircraft fasteners, connectors, lines, hoses, and fittings. There is no such thing as a simple change. So SAE it is...

I'm sure there are manufacturers outside of the U.S. that is use metric, but there are no metric fasteners (that I'm aware of) that meet the federal code for use in aircraft.

So, you guys who where proudly proclaiming that nothing in your country is anything but Metric, ask a friend who works in Aviation what's in their toolbox and report back, OK? And the next time you fly, remember that it's SAE fasteners getting you safely to your destination.

[big grin] [poke]

[size=14pt]

This has nothing to do with the merits of metric or imperial measurement.

It is because of the dominance (at least historically) of US aircraft manufacturing AND
Because every international manufacturer who wants to sell, or have their product fly, in the US has to have FAA approval!

End of story.  So  [poke]

[big grin]
 
Untidy Shop said:
wow said:
Yes, I know this was an April Fools joke. I am reviving it because I learned something new that I wanted to pass on, and give a playful poke to our Metric pals across the pond:

I have a friend working in europe on aircraft and they use mostly SAE tools. Stahlwille and gedore have aviation sets that are almost all sae with very little metric.

And, of course, NASA is SAE.

Sure Airbus will have a FEW metric fasteners, but the standard for aviation has been set and it is SAE. Aviation requires standardization especially in commercial aircraft. Many carriers use contract operations to handle major inspections, these shops handle Airbus, Boeing, Embraer etc... and are located around the world. Lots and lots of money has been dumped into the testing and approval of aircraft fasteners, connectors, lines, hoses, and fittings. There is no such thing as a simple change. So SAE it is...

I'm sure there are manufacturers outside of the U.S. that is use metric, but there are no metric fasteners (that I'm aware of) that meet the federal code for use in aircraft.

So, you guys who where proudly proclaiming that nothing in your country is anything but Metric, ask a friend who works in Aviation what's in their toolbox and report back, OK? And the next time you fly, remember that it's SAE fasteners getting you safely to your destination.

[big grin] [poke]

[size=14pt]

This has nothing to do with the merits of metric or imperial measurement.



Of course not - but it has everything to do with disputing the title of the thread and razing the people who dislike Imperial measurements!

[wink]
 
wow said:
Untidy Shop said:
wow said:
Yes, I know this was an April Fools joke. I am reviving it because I learned something new that I wanted to pass on, and give a playful poke to our Metric pals across the pond:

I have a friend working in europe on aircraft and they use mostly SAE tools. Stahlwille and gedore have aviation sets that are almost all sae with very little metric.

And, of course, NASA is SAE.

Sure Airbus will have a FEW metric fasteners, but the standard for aviation has been set and it is SAE. Aviation requires standardization especially in commercial aircraft. Many carriers use contract operations to handle major inspections, these shops handle Airbus, Boeing, Embraer etc... and are located around the world. Lots and lots of money has been dumped into the testing and approval of aircraft fasteners, connectors, lines, hoses, and fittings. There is no such thing as a simple change. So SAE it is...

I'm sure there are manufacturers outside of the U.S. that is use metric, but there are no metric fasteners (that I'm aware of) that meet the federal code for use in aircraft.

So, you guys who where proudly proclaiming that nothing in your country is anything but Metric, ask a friend who works in Aviation what's in their toolbox and report back, OK? And the next time you fly, remember that it's SAE fasteners getting you safely to your destination.

[big grin] [poke]

[size=14pt]

This has nothing to do with the merits of metric or imperial measurement.



Of course not - but it has everything to do with disputing the title of the thread and razing the people who dislike Imperial measurements!

[wink]

[size=12pt]
Having been suitably ' razed' I think I will go to sleep now. It is 0000hrs down here.  [big grin]
'
 
I think I should have typed 'razzing' instead of 'razing'. Different word, different meaning.

I blame my keyboard...

[wink]
 
Now there's an industry that needs some serious focus ... the car can go electric, power stations can use hydro, solar, nuclear, etc - but what and the going to do with that horrific earth burner and polluter that is the aircraft??

Granted our lives are in tune with the speed of air travel, but the planet is going to need a sustainable fast travel pretty soon! [blink]
 
re aircraft fuel I remember reading in the past year of a company that produces oils from refining algae. Their algae based "petroleum" products are used in auotomobile, boating and Aviation, they were supplying US military with aviation fuel so can't be too shabby of a substitute.

Just waiting for antimatter fuel sources but those DiLithium crystals are even harder to find than new oil deposits ;)

Andrew
 
TheTassieBFG said:
re aircraft fuel I remember reading in the past year of a company that produces oils from refining algae. Their algae based "petroleum" products are used in auotomobile, boating and Aviation, they were supplying US military with aviation fuel so can't be too shabby of a substitute.

Just waiting for antimatter fuel sources but those DiLithium crystals are even harder to find than new oil deposits ;)

Andrew

Rigel XII is your best bet I hear [cool]
 
Just realised I probably need to get out more [embarassed]
 
Back
Top