leakyroof said:FESTOOL in SPACEEEEEEEEE. If the next Stars Wars movie slips a systainer in a screen shot, we're all in trouble..... [scared] [scared] [big grin]
Thankfully with the current movie, I didn't see one, so sales and availability will stay stable for now. [poke] [poke] [poke] Wouldn't want to upset the apple cart.
Woodn't It Be Neat said:One of our FOG members [member=9290]GhostFist[/member] did work on the set but they weren't his systainers - here's a link to another FOG thread on it
Systainers on TV link
leakyroof said:FESTOOL in SPACEEEEEEEEE. If the next Stars Wars movie slips a systainer in a screen shot, we're all in trouble..... [scared] [scared] [big grin]
Thankfully with the current movie, I didn't see one, so sales and availability will stay stable for now. [poke] [poke] [poke] Wouldn't want to upset the apple cart.
Fesnewb said:Woodn't It Be Neat said:One of our FOG members [member=9290]GhostFist[/member] did work on the set but they weren't his systainers - here's a link to another FOG thread on it
Systainers on TV link
I wouldn't mind, but I actually did a forum search with 'The Expanse' as the search term, in case someone had already posted about the Systainers in this episode. Got zero hits. Sorry for the duplicate thread!
GhostFist said:Comparing the budget of star wars to the budget of the expanse would be like comparing the salaries of a paper boy to Rupert Murdock's. I know you weren't serious but there's no way star wars would buy an off the shelf product and try to pass it off as from the future. that being said productions will sell off redundant props at the end of a film for a song. A friend of mine bought a truck for a dollar. ....Canadian
Woodn't It Be Neat said:Fesnewb said:Woodn't It Be Neat said:One of our FOG members [member=9290]GhostFist[/member] did work on the set but they weren't his systainers - here's a link to another FOG thread on it
Systainers on TV link
I wouldn't mind, but I actually did a forum search with 'The Expanse' as the search term, in case someone had already posted about the Systainers in this episode. Got zero hits. Sorry for the duplicate thread!
Sorry [member=21004]Fesnewb[/member] - I meant for my post to be a adder to your note, I didn't mean to chastise you for duplicating.
Hope the season finds you well - Kevin
GhostFist said:. I know you weren't serious but there's no way star wars would buy an off the shelf product and try to pass it off as from the future. that being said productions will sell off redundant props at the end of a film for a song.
. I don't know, if a design really works, it is timeless.GhostFist said:Didn't attend the set sale for expanse so I don't know what they sold off. Imo it's a bit of a failure to present an item that's easily identifiable as something new from the distant future. this slight of hand goes on all the time mind you but the systainer being caught, takes a little away from the illusion of the distant future and deep space. Though they did have that drinking bird thing in the original alien, and it worked
And look how they couldn't improve on the T-Loc..... [wink] [wink] [wink]GhostFist said:I suppose, throwing convention aside however, we've seen at least two iterations of the systainers in a relatively short period. the crate itself has gone through design changes within the last 100 years as material processing has advanced. Expanse takes place 200 years in the future...