FOGwear

[Billnut]

no no no no pockets!!!

 

[peter halle]

So when is this going to be ready?      I need a new wardrobe

We are running the poll now about choices right now.  I have been in touch with several vendors.  A couple are actually members here.  A few have been recommended by other members.  One is local to me.  Each has done their sales pitch, but there will be samples, prototypes, comments from those who were winners in the Contest brought to you by the Fogtainers thread.  Then there will be the creativity on how they structure their program and pricing.  Just in time production and short run production is important.  So are the logistics.

The poll was designed to narrow down the choices.  If the whole program's success came down to deciding between pockets versus none - the answer would be none.  None is a cleaner more professional look.  Before you blast me - I prefer pockets myself.  Just showing that there are a lot of things to consider.  I am not looking at this as a retailer of goods.  I am a translator / palm reader / facilitator / realist.

So far the comments are what I have anticipated, but the culling process will start soon.

So to answer your question, I would guess 60 to 90 days before you will receive shirts / other stuff.

Just being honest.

Peter

 

[Frank Pellow]

no no no no pockets!!!

I see your no no no no and I raise you one.  Therefore yes yes yes yes yes pockets!  [poke]

 

[Steve R]

no no no no pockets!!!

I see your no no no no and I raise you one.  Therefore yes yes yes yes yes pockets!  [poke]

I see Frank Pellow's raise and raise one more YES..... [drooling].  If pockets are not professional..... Hmmmm everyone in the corporate world needs to have their suits and shirts re-done. [eek]

Cheers,
Steve

 

[peter halle]

So when is this going to be ready?      I need a new wardrobe

The poll was designed to narrow down the choices.  If the whole program's success came down to deciding between pockets versus none - the answer would be none.  None is a cleaner more professional look.  Before you blast me - I prefer pockets myself.  Just showing that there are a lot of things to consider. 
Peter

 

[Wonderwino]

I gotta have pockets!  [thumbs up]  Ever since I upgrades to a "smart" phone, the stupid thing won't stay on a belt or fit in a pants pocket where I can dig it out fast enough to answer it.  It is less subject to damage in a shirt pocket as well as easier to pull out.  [2cents]  [smile]

 

[Ken Nagrod]

Hopefully I can help Peter moderate this pocket/no pocket debate.  Where there would have been a pocket will be a cut out in the shirt for an exposed man-boob.  I know I can't make everyone happy, but hopefully this settles the issue.  Now the arguement will be on the left or right. [tongue]

 

[peter halle]

Hopefully I can help Peter moderate this pocket/no pocket debate.  Where there would have been a pocket will be a cut out in the shirt for an exposed man-boob.  I know I can't make everyone happy, but hopefully this settles the issue.  Now the arguement will be on the left or right. [tongue]

So that is why I see those little painter's rags in the boxes I buy.  Thanks for the explanation Ken! [big grin]

 

[Steve R]

Hopefully I can help Peter moderate this pocket/no pocket debate.  Where there would have been a pocket will be a cut out in the shirt for an exposed man-boob.  I know I can't make everyone happy, but hopefully this settles the issue.  Now the arguement will be on the left or right. [tongue]

Sooooo  [poke] what you didn't say but seem to be trying to imply is... no pocket...right?.....  Then Bye Bye...

Cheers,
Steve

P.S.  it is spelled "argument" not arguement [oops]

Take care!

 

[peter halle]

I hope to be able to offer both pockets and no pockets.

Peter

 

[Ken Nagrod]

Hopefully I can help Peter moderate this pocket/no pocket debate.  Where there would have been a pocket will be a cut out in the shirt for an exposed man-boob.  I know I can't make everyone happy, but hopefully this settles the issue.  Now the arguement will be on the left or right. [tongue]

Sooooo  [poke] what you didn't say but seem to be trying to imply is... no pocket...right?.....   Then Bye Bye...

Cheers,
Steve

P.S.  it is spelled "argument" not arguement [oops]

Steve, that's the Jersey 'e'.  Ask Dan Quayle.  [tongue]  I didn't say no pockets, I was just trying to offer a compromise, however, since you're so hung up on having a shirt with pockets, I offer you ----- POCKETS WITHIN A POCKET sort of like a file folder.  Yes, yours will have tabs so you can index things or store RO 90 sandpaper, your choice.  [big grin]

 

[Brice Burrell]

Now you've done it Ken, I want my pockets to fit 125mm abrasives. [tongue]

 

[Mac]

Now you've done it Ken, I want my pockets to fit 125mm abrasives. [tongue]

A real man would need one to fit the 150mm, Brice...  [poke]

 

[woodguy7]

Did i mention i have a Planex, 215mm baby  [laughing]

 

[Mac]

Did i mention i have a Planex, 215mm baby  [laughing]

Show off.  [ban]

 

[Ken Nagrod]

I'm talking t-shirts, not female kangaroo wear.  [big grin]

 

[jmbfestool]

Did i mention i have a Planex, 215mm baby  [laughing]

You dont have the planex!  Do you?  [huh]

JMB

 

[woodguy7]

LOL, no i dont  [big grin]  Just boasting about pocket size 

 

[jmbfestool]

LOL, no i dont  [big grin]  Just boasting about pocket size 

Few u had me going! I thought u had a festool I didn't have  [poke] [poke] [poke] [poke] [poke]

 

[woodguy7]

Do you have the Audi R8 ?  [big grin]