mino
Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 1,984
One quick comment from my recent use of it. The great feature, compared to a GRS 16, is that there is something above the material which prevents the weight of the square tipping the rail by raising the cutting side.
I used it for some dado work on 4x4 framing along with the GRS16 PE.
In the past, I would just use two of my GRS 16's to "restrict" the 4x4 having the squares tightly go from both sides of it. The problem was there is nothing preventing the 600 mm rail from constantly wanting to tip in the square side direction. Using one FS-WA and only one GRS solved this - the FS-WA preventing the tipping.
Based on this experience, I would advise anyone liking the TSO concept to still get _one_ GRS16 PE and couple it with the FS-WA.
I will see, but if I find I do not use the 2nd GRS 16 for a year or so, replacing it with the FS-WA, I will probably sell it and keep only one.
I used it for some dado work on 4x4 framing along with the GRS16 PE.
In the past, I would just use two of my GRS 16's to "restrict" the 4x4 having the squares tightly go from both sides of it. The problem was there is nothing preventing the 600 mm rail from constantly wanting to tip in the square side direction. Using one FS-WA and only one GRS solved this - the FS-WA preventing the tipping.
Based on this experience, I would advise anyone liking the TSO concept to still get _one_ GRS16 PE and couple it with the FS-WA.
I will see, but if I find I do not use the 2nd GRS 16 for a year or so, replacing it with the FS-WA, I will probably sell it and keep only one.