AlexThePalex
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 7,808
It was the Mars orbiter. It was JPL /NASA designing in metric units and Lockeheed Martin designing in English units. They lost a $125 million orbiter. This is very vivid in my mind as I was a founder of an engineering startup efunda that was developing a units calculator called unitsiq .charley1968 said:Wasn't the Challenger disaster due to some f...-up between metric and imperial. Or was it some mars-lander?
DrD said:Been reading this for a couple of days now. It would appear that there are/were 2 simultaneous threads about nearly the same thing - USA going metric and Arrogance of Festool. I find these both somewhat amusing and a little alarming. Take Texas for example - the 12th largest economy in the world, and that is only 1 of 50 sovereign States within the USA. Granted Germany is probably still the 4th largest economy - bolstered greatly by USA sales of Mercedes Benz, VW & all that they own, BMW, and others including Festool, but I digress. The great majority of teaching and technical publications emanating from the USA are done using imperial measurements. Most USA citizens are not fluent in metric, most USA business are conducted using Imperial measurements. Since there is a great pool of NAINA Festool products, one could surmise that Festool spends a good deal of resources in making "changes" in their products to be compatible and compliant with USA requirements. Why then is it too much to ask for what is sold here to be marked in Imperial measurements? Why should we, spending our money, bend to a "foreign" system, and some possible "arrogance"? My BMW's and Infinity's - both made in native metric &/or Shakkan-ho metrics - come to the USA with Imperial metrics.
Just my $0.02 (not Euros - I don't even have a Euro symbol on my Japanese-based computer keyboard).
SittingElf said:I totally disagree with the idea that the USA, being the megapower that we are, arrogantly continue to stay on the imperial system, while the rest of the world has STANDARDIZED on the metric system....save two other countries of no import.
We have already missed THREE supposed deadlines for converting our measurement system to metric. It's time to standardize and synchronize with the REST of the world!
Furthermore, our failure to do so as was previously mandated, is a captulation, and an absolute failure of our education system that has aggressively resisted having to teach an entirely new system of measure. Other countries have done so...and admittedly with some diffculty, but a "10" system is far more easy once learned.
I personally am in favor of a complete conversion in the USA...by law if necessary, and the companies that have to retool and re-design their products can just suck it up! Time to join the rest of the world! [mad]
Cheers,
Frank
SittingElf said:I totally disagree with the idea that the USA, being the megapower that we are, arrogantly continue to stay on the imperial system, while the rest of the world has STANDARDIZED on the metric system....save two other countries of no import.
We have already missed THREE supposed deadlines for converting our measurement system to metric. It's time to standardize and synchronize with the REST of the world!
Furthermore, our failure to do so as was previously mandated, is a captulation, and an absolute failure of our education system that has aggressively resisted having to teach an entirely new system of measure. Other countries have done so...and admittedly with some diffculty, but a "10" system is far more easy once learned.
I personally am in favor of a complete conversion in the USA...by law if necessary, and the companies that have to retool and re-design their products can just suck it up! Time to join the rest of the world! [mad]
Cheers,
Frank
[size=13pt]Alex said:[attachimg=1]
Mr Heavy said:missing the point entirely that they're not actually alternatives, they are parallel systems with different strengths.
Alex said:Mr Heavy said:missing the point entirely that they're not actually alternatives, they are parallel systems with different strengths.
They actually really are alternatives. Where one system is the evolution of the other.
There is just as much strength in imperial as the horse carriage is strong against a car. Sure, the horse carriage is romantic, but for your daily business you're really better off with the latter.
If you simply stick to measuring you will not really see a difference between metric and imperial. But once you start doing calculations with those measurements, you will understand the benefit of metric.
Paul G said:I do calcs in decimel inches just fine.
Alex said:Paul G said:I do calcs in decimel inches just fine.
At some point you'll have to convert to another unit, like foot, yard or mile.
Alex said:Paul G said:I do calcs in decimel inches just fine.
At some point you'll have to convert to another unit, like foot, yard or mile.
Paul G said:I do calcs in decimel inches just fine.