Lack of OF 1400 accessories

Brad701

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
3
The 1010 and 2200 both have accessory kits available and the 1400 does not. Is it because it is naturally more versatile than the 1010 and 2200, and doesnt need accessories? The 1010 seems to do everything I want but doesnt have 1/2" collet capability and I just don't need another large router.
 
It may be because the OF1400 comes pretty complete. The table widener has always been available separately, along with the copy rings. I suppose it's to big/heavy for the angle arm attachment. The acrylic template fits all of them. It comes with several dust extraction fittings and the edge guide.  The snap-in copy rings aren't really adjustable, so the centering cone is unnecessary....what else could be added?
The only thing missing would be the Systainer itself.... oh, the rail adaptor.

I suppose it would be nice to put it all together, but maybe not feasible for them?
 
Most of what now comes in the 1010 accessories systainer used to just fit in the Systainer of the OF 1010 itself and it was 20mm lower too.

In my OF 1010 Systainer I have the OF 1010, the parallel guide, the rail adapter, fine adjust for the rail adapter, copy rings, swiveling dust deflector, side dust extractor hood and it fits just fine. Circle jig is probably in there too but might be in the router bit Systainer. Cone is also in that latter.

The separate M187 systainer for a part of that is just bloat.
 
Crazyraceguy said:
It may be because the OF1400 comes pretty complete. The table widener has always been available separately, along with the copy rings. I suppose it's to big/heavy for the angle arm attachment. The acrylic template fits all of them. It comes with several dust extraction fittings and the edge guide.  The snap-in copy rings aren't really adjustable, so the centering cone is unnecessary....what else could be added?
The only thing missing would be the Systainer itself.... oh, the rail adaptor.

I suppose it would be nice to put it all together, but maybe not feasible for them?

I think you just answered the question that I really meant to ask which is "are the common attachments engineered around the 1400 platform?"
Thanks
 
Back
Top