making wooden cameras

pixelated

Member
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
478
Location
Northeast U.S.
I know of Gandolfi cameras by reputation, but I’ve never seen one in person.

Interesting short video on how they were made, and on craftsmanship.

 
I considered making one. The obstacles:

1. Making the camera back that holds the film holder.
2. Making the bellows (but I think you can purchase them)
3. Making the linear bearings that are appropriate to a wooden camera.

I concluded that a field camera would be easiest to make, but never went ahead with the project.

Wood field camera (the best ones were things of beauty):

1760747043999.jpg
 
I almost convinced myself that I could reproduce that in my shop, but nearly every step in the process would require some sort of engineering on my part, and as I mentioned in my first post in this thread, there were some stumbling blocks that I was not sure I could step over. In end, it seemed too challenging (though I liked the idea that it would not involve any heavy lifting—my body was starting to complain about 4’ x 8’ sheets of plywood).

If there were published plans, I might have given it a “go”, but I did not find any at that time.

This time I found an “Instructables” 7-step building plan, and a not-very-attractive view camera plan plus others that were not online some 25 years ago.

But a classic mahogany field camera was my aspiration.


The photos of this old Thornton Pickard view camera, still has me convincing myself that I could make the mahogany parts, but not the brass parts. (15 detailed photos):


I would note that view camera lenses are currently sold and currently produced. The best lenses are expensive, but all of the lenses include a F-stop diaphragm and a shutter, so the camera production really only needs the body, back and lens holder.

A camera for portraits-only, would not need to have a focus mechanism as you could establish as standard shooting distance. A very limited camera, but easy to make. Just a box, really (with a lens board and a back to hold the film holders).
 
Last edited:
That's the format camera Ansel Adams used with his photographic adventures.
Actually, the image I linked was for a 4” x 5” field camera (I’m not sure of the manufacturer).

Adams famously used the big brother: An 8” x 10” Deardoff. I found a picture of one (not Adams’) on line. Less wood, but impressive and beautiful (and obviously capable of fine photography).

Finger joints on the smaller camera, and butt joints with aluminum corner angles on the Deardoff.

In my opinion the Deardoff is less attractive, but the huge negative is more capable.
1760843781481.jpg
 
I have a 5x7 Deardorff, but no handy pictures of it at the moment. They are quite the heavy beast compared to many of the wooden cameras around.
 
Actually, the image I linked was for a 4” x 5” field camera (I’m not sure of the manufacturer).

Adams famously used the big brother: An 8” x 10” Deardoff. I found a picture of one (not Adams’) on line. Less wood, but impressive and beautiful (and obviously capable of fine photography).

Finger joints on the smaller camera, and butt joints with aluminum corner angles on the Deardoff.

In my opinion the Deardoff is less attractive, but the huge negative is more capable.
View attachment 378626
Thanks for that... :) ...without a lens & tripod for reference it looked like an 8 x 10. 😵‍💫 Interestingly enough, Ansel, like most photographers, didn't use just one camera but actually chose the camera based on what he wanted the result to look like.
 
In the video there is a close up of the guy clearing the bottom of a recess for some brass hardware and he’s using a little wooden “hags tooth” router plane.
That got me looking at commercially available router planes and none of them could do that because the bottom of the blades are flat and too deep so the blade won’t fit in such a small area. The cutting edge of the blade needs to approach the work at a 45 degree angle. Of course nowadays we’d use a small cordless router but does any such manual configuration exist theses days?
 
In the video there is a close up of the guy clearing the bottom of a recess for some brass hardware and he’s using a little wooden “hags tooth” router plane.
That got me looking at commercially available router planes and none of them could do that because the bottom of the blades are flat and too deep so the blade won’t fit in such a small area. The cutting edge of the blade needs to approach the work at a 45 degree angle. Of course nowadays we’d use a small cordless router but does any such manual configuration exist theses days?
Lee Valley makes both a hinge mortising plane and a router. They also make replacement blades for them as narrow as 1/4”. Maybe that would work. Caveat: I have found that Lee Valley tools are well-made and nicely designed, but a bit pricey.

The Veritas small router is $65.00, but the replacement blades are $25.00 + each.

Note: The pricing shown is pre-tariff and would be imported to the USA from Canada. Which amazing (to me) is apparently not a favored trading partner anymore.

1760899984147.png


 
Last edited:
Back
Top