MFT 3 question

The walko might be the way to go if you work on the fly, but for those of us who have a shop or garage, this sawhorse setup was the way to go for me.  Frank was kind enough to send the plans to me.  I might still have if anyone needs.
 
Agreed!  This would work especially well for me in my one-car garage shop where space is very limited.  If I were to purchase an MFT, it would need to serve many functions (breaking down full sheets of plywood, outfeed support for my tablesaw, workbench, finishing table, routing tasks, clamping tasks, etc.  It currently would fulfill "some" of my needs, but not all. 

If only they made it a tad bigger, and added some type of height adjustability...

Jason

Charimon said:
Job
I was surprised to read that the US was the largest users of the mft. I read it here and we can probably find it with a search.  I also agree that portability is so important for on sight use.  Weight can be overcome with a well designed Wheel kit.   I couldn't believe how much of a difference they made to the Walko.  you are right

jvsteenb said:
But I can tell you that the TS-and-rail definitely is considered a sheet cutting system where I live.

But I don't think the MFT system was ever meant for breaking down sheetgoods.
All I am suggesting is that they should have designed the table to bring out the Full (sheet)  potential of the system.

I am not saying that it preforms badly at anything it does.  Im saying that it had So much more potentiol  within easy reach.
 
Kosta, I'm not completely sure that I get it. How will it mate with the mft/3 and what will be the cutting support?

I used the Eurekazone rails for a circular saw several years ago. They are pretty substantial.
 
Back
Top