polarsea1 said:
This will probably fall mainly on deaf ears but the high end stuff used for setting up woodworking machines is cool but really unnecessary. Buy and read John White's 'Care and Repair of Shop Machines: A Complete Guide to Setup, Troubleshooting, and Maintenance'. Save a lot of money and learn a little something.
Well yeah, there's what's cool and what's necessary--and never the twain shall meet...
I like the book you mentioned--it is absolutely fundamental to be able to set up a machine correctly, to be able to troubleshoot sources of error etc. And just as essential to figure out what's an acceptable degree of accuracy for whatever type of woodworking we happen to be doing. I see a lot of crossover from the machining trades where people are trying to set up their woodworking machines with tools that were used on metal machining mills, etc.--so you see all sorts of gadgets that are super accurate but it seems a lot of people are not aware that a table saw cannot be setup as accurately as a mill, nor does it need to, because wood is what it is and it's vastly different from metal.
But I do love me a good gadget, especially if it saves me a bunch of steps and is useful across a bunch of tools, and it has frustration-lessening repeatability. And for me it's fun to attempt to set up a woodworking machine as close as I possibly can.
That doesn't mean that every gadget out there is worth the money. For example, the usefulness of the Master Plate is beyond me. Because you're measuring to the plate, but cutting with the blade. You can do a static test with any good square but you still need to do a dynamic check like a test cut if you're going to do fine work, and if you have a subpar blade, it's time to get a better one. The Woodpecker Saw Gauge also looks very limited in its design--it doesn't seem that it's capable of reaching other things to check. You have to stack these cylinders in the miter track to set it up. I think that you're introducing potential for error when you then have to slide the whole loose setup to the other side of the blade and then back, the way it's necessary in the method I use. These are definitely cases of "to each his own". I'm personally partial to the A-Line-It system that Jerry Cole came out with, for its' ease of use, repeatability, and application across many different types of machines. I also like the way William Ng calculates the error and adjusts his crosscut sled using the 5 cut method--check out his video on youtube.