jhawoodworking
Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 2
Hi Guys I'm very new here and just signed up to ask some questions.
I own a OF 1400 and needless to say I am a tad disappointed.
I am routing dados using the guide rail system I am usinf my own 2.5 hp shop dust collection system. I do not have or plan to have a mft.
1. the dust collection shroud is installed correctly and it collects zero dust it all spits out from underneath the router and the dado I just cut. 9 Yes my dust system is on and plenty powerfull.
2. accuracy since the tool sits above the work-piece by the depth of the rails and the guide arrow is 1/16th of an inch wide itself i have not been able to get within 1/16th of exact so far ive cut 5 test dados and the are all of anywhere from 1/16th to even 1/8th in.
3. square. there is no way to "quickly" and accurately insure the workpiece is square to the rails and the router.
4. There is to much play in the guides while adjusting them contributing to the inaccuracy above.
I am not trying to complain I would like some help fixing these issues please.
Thank you
John
I own a OF 1400 and needless to say I am a tad disappointed.
I am routing dados using the guide rail system I am usinf my own 2.5 hp shop dust collection system. I do not have or plan to have a mft.
1. the dust collection shroud is installed correctly and it collects zero dust it all spits out from underneath the router and the dado I just cut. 9 Yes my dust system is on and plenty powerfull.
2. accuracy since the tool sits above the work-piece by the depth of the rails and the guide arrow is 1/16th of an inch wide itself i have not been able to get within 1/16th of exact so far ive cut 5 test dados and the are all of anywhere from 1/16th to even 1/8th in.
3. square. there is no way to "quickly" and accurately insure the workpiece is square to the rails and the router.
4. There is to much play in the guides while adjusting them contributing to the inaccuracy above.
I am not trying to complain I would like some help fixing these issues please.
Thank you
John