Crazyraceguy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
- Messages
- 4,897
I have had a set of Snappy brand self-centering bits for many years, never had an issue with them. They have performed exactly as expected. The other day, I broke the drill bit inside the smallest one, 5/32" I think. No big deal, I will just replace it with one from this little import set that I was given a few months ago. This set is some cheap Chinese thing, made to look German by the name. (Werkzeug)
They even come with spare drill bits, so I didn't have to disassemble one to steal it.
This is where the problems come in, for both brands.
The Snappy, which prides itself on being American made, uses a proprietary extra-long drill bit. There is no need for that, the drilling depth of self-centering drills is not that big of a deal. They are for tiny screws in piano hinges and such. It does however mean that you have to buy it from them, which I am sure is the point.
The cheap knock-offs are shorter, using normal length drills, which shows that it can be done in the first place, but they are the most hideous, course looking thing out there. The real point about the copy of the real thing problem, that I have seen is that they are so close, but critically wrong in some simple way? I don't get it? If you are going to unapologetically copy something, at least understand the point of it. The cap that screws on, holding the end nib and spring is knurled around the base, to help unscrew it, on the Snappy branded ones.
But on the knock off, the knurling is on the base of the unit itself? That is not only useless to get that cap off, at that point it is not necessary at all. They are putting in an extra step that does nothing, except "look" similar, until you unscrew it? Stupid.
As I see it, they both fail. One for unnecessarily complicating a thing to make it proprietary and the other for not even being able to copy correctly.
I am not a fan of these rip-off types of items, but I just don't get how they can be "so close" and still be so far at the same time.
The same thing happened in the autobody industry when I worked there in the 90s. Aftermarket fenders (and other parts) "look" like they will fit, but they just never do?
The broken one is still longer than the other.
They even come with spare drill bits, so I didn't have to disassemble one to steal it.
This is where the problems come in, for both brands.
The Snappy, which prides itself on being American made, uses a proprietary extra-long drill bit. There is no need for that, the drilling depth of self-centering drills is not that big of a deal. They are for tiny screws in piano hinges and such. It does however mean that you have to buy it from them, which I am sure is the point.
The cheap knock-offs are shorter, using normal length drills, which shows that it can be done in the first place, but they are the most hideous, course looking thing out there. The real point about the copy of the real thing problem, that I have seen is that they are so close, but critically wrong in some simple way? I don't get it? If you are going to unapologetically copy something, at least understand the point of it. The cap that screws on, holding the end nib and spring is knurled around the base, to help unscrew it, on the Snappy branded ones.
But on the knock off, the knurling is on the base of the unit itself? That is not only useless to get that cap off, at that point it is not necessary at all. They are putting in an extra step that does nothing, except "look" similar, until you unscrew it? Stupid.
As I see it, they both fail. One for unnecessarily complicating a thing to make it proprietary and the other for not even being able to copy correctly.
I am not a fan of these rip-off types of items, but I just don't get how they can be "so close" and still be so far at the same time.
The same thing happened in the autobody industry when I worked there in the 90s. Aftermarket fenders (and other parts) "look" like they will fit, but they just never do?
The broken one is still longer than the other.