Brice Burrell said:
Matthew tried to get members to take better advantage of the gallery and it never happened. The problem is the members don't always know exactly how to use it, I'm not sure how to make that info more readily available. In the past a member only had to ask for a gallery of their own (I'm assuming the process is the same now). ... What can Festool do to improve the gallery, I'm not sure, I do like the idea of increasing the file size if possible, maybe a provision for larger files like PDFs or SketchUp files.
My original plan for the gallery was to have it fit into a larger effort to make the FOG a full multi-media zone where every member had full sets of links to his or her posts, photos, and videos. The site re-design I did in early 2008 was the first major step in that direction, and the gallery was another part. But technically, it's very difficult to pull it off the way I envisioned. Over time, the gallery developed nicely as a repository of files and images, which members could use to either store or embed in their forum posts.
The way the gallery software works, member galleries have to be created by hand, which is why members needed to ask for them. Theoretically, the administrator could create a new gallery (folder) for every member without waiting for a request. But that would be unbelievably time consuming. The gallery and the forum are actually separate entities, and it is only with software tricks that I was able to get the membership data linked between the two.
Increasing the file size, of course, has to do with the server space. When I ran the forum, using the Web hosting service I subscribed to, it would have been prohibitively expensive for me to get enough space to accomodate Sketchup files.
Sometimes, and this is true of all software systems, what seems like an easy thing to do from a customer point of view is actually really difficult technically. It can be frustrating when you're the one designing the site and really want to give your members what they ask for.
Peter Halle said:
Contests are great, but what ended up happening towards the end was that if it was based on the project itself, people were not going to post if they felt that the prize wasn't worthy. IMHO monthly project contests are too often - they become normal versus something to create a buzz.
Yes, the concept for the contests seemed to stray for that reason. My goal for the contests was to use them as a way to get members posting more, and posting more variety. I also wanted to encourage members to look back through FOG history and find posts that were not as visible any more simply because they were a bit older. That's why a lot of the contest themes I put together had to do with finding existing posts.
But running contests ends up being very time consuming. A lot of background work has to be done to contact sellers to donate items, then you have to set up the rules and manage questions and concerns. Random contests make that a bit easier, but they lose the edge I mentioned above.
Like the software, sometimes something that seems easy is actually quite complex to implement!
Stay in touch,
Matthew