SYSTAINER³ available from September

Spandex said:
I don't really get the drama around this.
The only real issue seems to be the stack height, and if you are one of the people who care about that (and that is only a certain group of people) then carry on buying T-Locs until they're not available from Tanos/Festool, then start buying them from eBay (because for every person who wants to stick to T-Loc, there will be many more people who want to sell old T-Locs so they can move to Systainer³ - Same thing happened with the Classic Systainer).
For everyone else, why does it matter if you have a mixture of T-Loc and Systainer³? I've moved loads of my tools to T-Loc and have cabinets full of SYS-AZ drawers, but I have no interest in stack heights so the change to Systainer³ will have no impact on me at all.
As for how long it will take to migrate over... put it like this, Tanos STILL has the Classic line on their website, and you can still buy them new from some European retailers. The idea that the original T-Loc will be phased out some time in 2020 is fanciful.
I agree on all points.
I also think front handle is a big improvement if you store your systainers on shelves, particularly high above. That was a major drawback of standard t-loc comparing to l-boxx.
Also, integrated side slot simplifies racking and saves money and space.
 
The front handle and side slots are a good idea.  Having a wider variety of larger footprint systainers is a good change.

The height change and removal of card labeling slots are a step backwards.  Also, AFAIK there are no drawer/combi versions available.
 

Attachments

  • sys handle.jpg
    sys handle.jpg
    67.6 KB · Views: 417
Some place selling some old thing someplace doesn't mean a thing to anyone.  Unless a manufacture is making them new currently, it's dead, that's all that matters in that regard. You don't do anything in life where you need to continue to procure something and they are no longer made.

I don't most people care so much about the new models or changes being made, everyone understands revisions,  and the sad part here is they didn't change very much. But the way Tanos has got systainers into the ecosystem of many companies and used in many different ways a change can cause a large issue.  If it means that products that exist today will no longer exist in the future because of this change, that is a big issue.  If it means some companies decide to base their products of non-systainer options, that's a problem.

I don't think the change would have been much of a  concern to folks if the heights didn't change and the side card slots stayed.  The changes were made for Van racking, which is fine if it was a parallel line, but since it comes at a break in compatibility with the old, it's bad.  Yes most of what happens with the boxes is compatible, much like how T-loc's are largely compatibly with Classics, but folks are generally not going to want a mix. 

If the new ones added a front handle, and added side rail features, but everything else stay'd the same, I doubt much of anyone would have an issue.  Sure they would look a bit different, but that's a minor concern.

This is always going to be an issue when people spend a lot of money on and build around a proprietary product.  I think Tanos could have planned the heights of systainers originally much better, why they now changed it is confusing.  They could have made heights that fit in with the old ones (half sizes).
 
DeformedTree said:
Some place selling some old thing someplace doesn't mean a thing to anyone.  Unless a manufacture is making them new currently, it's dead, that's all that matters in that regard.
The point made earlier was that classic systainers are still easily available from a number of retailers some 10 years after t-loc introduction. Tanos is still making them now.
 
Exactly. People are acting like having a large ‘investment’ in T-Loc is suddenly a huge issue, when clearly it’s not.

If anyone out there needs stack heights to remain the same, their current T-Loc collecting isn’t going to suddenly explode, and any new tools they buy can easily be moved to T-Loc if needed (there will be people willing to swap if someone doesn’t want to buy new, just as there are now with Classic and T-Loc).

Or, you just swap your new tool into a T-Loc you already own, but don’t need to take on site and use in certain height stacks.

Everything else about the new Systainers is compatible, so having a mixture will have absolutely zero effect on you as long as you manage the stacking height issue. If having non-matching systainers DOES affect you, that’s something you need to discuss with a psychologist, not Tanos ;)

And finally, you do realise that the vast majority of people will already have a random mix of T-Loc, classic systainer, L-Boxx, Toughbox, whatever? Most people think having a collection of matching systainers is a bit mad. Being nerdy and passionate about something is fine, but you need to understand that most people aren’t. This change is going to have absolutely no negative impact on Tanos ability to sell systainers to other brands - in fact, it should help. Van racking is pretty common in Europe, but the only Systainer racks I’ve seen have been custom made ones posted on here. But Sortimo is a relatively common sight when you walk past an open van. Utility companies kit out their vans in bulk with it. Tanos currently can’t even begin to compete with Sortimo, but clearly they want to.
 
I understand that some T-LOC owners are freaking out, thinking the world is about to end.

SYSTAINER³ offers only 3 major improvements: front carry handle, integrated racking slides, and slightly bigger heights.

You can get the carry handle for T-LOC SYS-1 and SYS2, so that takes care of it. Will you carry next 3 new systainer  sizes by the side handle? Nope... the only reason the handle is there is to lift it up and get it out of the van racking system, since it's missing slides. So for anyone who is not investing in the van racking system, third generation update is pretty useless.

I have about 20 systainers all in T-LOC size and i'm not planning to upgrade anything to new ones.

As far as bigger heights are concerned, yes maybe that's an improvement for some people who aren't obsessed about stacking equal heights between second and third generations. I tried to adapt storing non-festool tools in t-loc systainer and I wasn't happy with how things were working out. Milwaukee M18 impact driver can't fit into a SYS1 with the belt hook attached, so each time I needed to take off the belt hook before storing the tool nicely.  Milwaukee angle grinder could only fit in a SYS2. Milwaukee M18 gun could only fit in a SYS 1 or 2 diagonally and it had to be completely disassembled, with push rod unscrewed and removed from the gear assembly. So in terms of size and adapting T-LOC's to different tools, second generation of systainers kind of sucks, maybe third one would be better. If i could fit a tool that resides in T-LOC 2 in a third version sys1, there would be some advantages of newer higher sizes. Having broken some systainers, I think they are only designed for the shop. I also have a Milwaukee Packout and it's much more durable storage solution at a third of the price if you consider how much storage space you are getting.

 
Completely agree that the updates aren’t of benefit to people who aren’t interested in some kind of racking - although plenty of people on here are very interested in workshop racking, so I would imagine the integrated slides and front handle are just as useful there as they are in a van.

But on the flip side, the front handle and integrated slides aren’t a negative for people who won’t use them either. The only downside to the new design is the stacking heights, and as I’ve said, this is so easy to work around that it’s not going to have any real-world impact on anyone who currently makes use of it.
 
Spandex said:
And finally, you do realise that the vast majority of people will already have a random mix of T-Loc, classic systainer, L-Boxx, Toughbox, whatever? Most people think having a collection of matching systainers is a bit mad.

How many people will have classics? I technically have one because Maxi was never updated.  In a market like the US Festool wasn't very big by the time they switched to T-loc.  I think I have around 50 systainers, only odd ball is the one maxi.

I have no other brands because well, most tools don't come with any case, so I have to put them in something. A lot of the brand cases that exist in the Europe don't exist here.  Dewalt and Milwaukee each have some sort of system, but I've never seen them in a store or anyplace. In general sounds like the dewalts are complete junk.  When I buy non festool tools and other items, I buy systainers and set them up for the tools.  Mixing different brand cases wouldn't work as they general are different form factors.  I did  look into a system from a competitor to Tanos, but they don't ship to the US.

This all spins back to folks understanding that folks use such containers differently. If your primary focus for them is consistent storage, maximizing that aspect of things, changes do matter.  If your need is Van usage then things will be different than the storage person.  Thus why just thinking people will just have mix of brands and types doesn't fly for a lot of folks because that's the very thing they set up not to have.  It's why all my blow molded cases tools came in ended up in the recycling bin. The goal is not to have a tool in a case, it's to have the same form factor case for all the tools and other items.

Ideally there would be an ISO standard for such containers. The basic form factor is a quasi standard (Euro-norm), but the other aspects of the design like the latches and such are not.

Obviously people will transition over to the new ones. That doesn't change the matter that for a lot of folks how they get used, they are very much a down grade.  Things like the loss of the side label is a big deal for as it a key to my usage. I make labels for all 3 sides.

If you don't understand why people have issue with the new ones, or some make a big deal of it, just stop and realize not everyone uses them the same way. Things like the height changes are annoying to me, but not a deal breaker, but I absolutely understand why it is a big deal for others.  Given a choice I'd prefer them not have change the heights.

And yes changes to them do impact the investment in what you have. Since you invest in items like Systainers to have the stability in design and to be able to keep buying the same thing. Now when things change you loose a core part of what people are going for. Some folks really do want to be able to buy the exact same thing any time they want for the rest of their lives.  If you want to see a similar example of this, look what has happened with Rubbermaid discontinuing the rubbermaid roughneck totes.  Rubbermaid made the exact same product (ignoring color) for decades, I think I read they go back to at least the 1970s.  They were never super great, the part that made them great was that you could just keep buying the same product forever. People built the way the use them in their business around them, they organized their home storage around them and only them.  A lot of stuff was built around that product because it never change in design.  Then a few years ago they discontinued them, the fallout and anger from this has been massive.  I had over a 100 of them some folks and businesses vastly more. It's not like you can just change to something else and nothing else has that stability in design.  It wasn't about being a great design, it was about always being the same design. They were a pretty poor design, and expensive for what they were. But being able to run to the corner store and pick up a couple more year after year and they integrate in with what you have perfectly was the key.

A systainer is not a perfect design, but what it had is consistency.  Are the new ones a massive change, no, not really.  But they are design changes to target a completely different application. When the changes don't benefit those who will continue to use them the same way they have, that is where you get issues.
 
I don’t think we actually disagree on the fundamental point.

I agree that the changes aren’t massive. I agree that they’ve done it to target a different market. What I disagree on slightly is the ‘issue’ with them doing it. Yes, there will be people who are annoyed by this because the changes don’t benefit them, but they will be a minority and they will be able to carry on with the standard t-loc for the rest of their lives without issue.

Given that standard t-locks will be available one way or another for many many years to come, and given that you could easily sell any systainer3 you got with a tool and buy an equivalent old t-loc (and probably make a small profit), how are these new systainers going to cause a single issue for people who only want t-locs in their stack?

That’s the point. I’m not trying to persuade people that the new design isn’t a problem for them. I’m not trying to persuade them they’re wrong. I’m trying to point out it is a completely avoidable problem.
 
Remember when there was a twenty page collection of rants over imperial scales?
Nevermind that nobody uses scales on those kinds of tools...

Foggers are afraid of change.  The new systainers look great. 
 
It seems that tanos is in partnership with bott van racking systems. New systainers are built to fit bott system, they are specially made to fit drawer racking system. Cut outs are based on bott system. Why they would do that doesn’t make much sense since outside of Europe bott systems are not really available. Same t-loc just different corners and three hinges on a back instead of two, which will help from twisting on uneven surface. That they changed the sizing, yeah sucks but that’s all to fit bott racking system in vans.
 
yetihunter said:
Foggers are afraid of change.  The new systainers look great.
'Look great' is pointless when they're incompatible with what you already have. As it happens to be with the sort boxes:

Classic colored: 49mm grid, 71mm height
SORT/3 (2015): 60mm grid and 71mm height
Systainer³ (2020): 50mm grid, 69mm height

Having two types of insert boxes for small parts already being a huge annoyance (as it gets in the way constantly since you often can't simply move an insert box from one container to the other), turning that into three incompatible insert boxes is that high disregard of the customer that this figurative middle finger is illuminated and blinking. I for one have lost my will to give Festool/Tanos any more money for everything even remotely related to 'sort' they might come up with and will switch to a supplier (like Auer) that doesn't introduce incompatible changes to their boxes every some years because whynot.
 
You may want to check out ESSVE essbox system. For practicality superior to TANOS, AUER or any other similar system I know of. Transparent boxes and each box can (does not need to!) be closed separately with a lid. Very well thought out system.
 
Just looked at the Essve Essbox system on YouTube. Don’t even understand how they’re comparable to tanos & Auer systems? As far as I see they’re not.

As for comments that the new sustainers aren’t even an issue because one can just sell the new and buy an old. . . Lol - you’ve got more time on your hands than I. That is one pita solution.

I don’t think anyone has blown up too much about this size change. Just commented on the inconvenience of the change. How about letting those comments stand rather than invalidating them with such drivel.
 
That ESSVE essbox system looks good. Great alternative to Tanos, Auer, and others with some refinements.
 
What’s interesting about Essve’s storage system is that they’re mainly a fastener/hardware supplier and they wanted a more functional way to package the supplies. So, it’s most practical if you are buying supplies from them, already packed into their handy boxes.
 
Can someone link me whatever I’m missing in the Essve system that makes them comparable. All I’m seeing is nice fixings boxes, nothing that can hold tools. .
 
Back
Top