JonSchuck said:A year or so ago I was wondering just how accurate those holes in the mft/3s were. I took two Qwas dogs, stuck them in adjacent holes and measured them with my digital caliper, outside to outside. I wrote that number on the mft3 right between the holes. I did that with about half the holes in one mft/3 and about one fourth the holes on my other one, in both the x and y axis. I was looking for variation.
I just went out and looked at my tables. Most of the holes were within three thousandths of 4.585 inches. However, the smallest was 4.575" and the largest was 4.593". I was very careful to hold the caliper the same on all of them. I checked all of them twice and the ones that were way off several times more.
Now, when using the dogs as a fence, I keep them as far apart as possible to minimize the error.
I would say that 90% or more were within .004" of 4.585". However, the extremes were .018" or about 1\55". I didn't notice any slop with the Qwas dogs but even a very little bit that I wouldn't notice could make a difference. Also, as Corwin has said, any sag in the table would change things. But it would be nice to start with perfectly square so my own dumbass mistakes wouldn't be compounded.Svar said:JonSchuck said:A year or so ago I was wondering just how accurate those holes in the mft/3s were. I took two Qwas dogs, stuck them in adjacent holes and measured them with my digital caliper, outside to outside. I wrote that number on the mft3 right between the holes. I did that with about half the holes in one mft/3 and about one fourth the holes on my other one, in both the x and y axis. I was looking for variation.
I just went out and looked at my tables. Most of the holes were within three thousandths of 4.585 inches. However, the smallest was 4.575" and the largest was 4.593". I was very careful to hold the caliper the same on all of them. I checked all of them twice and the ones that were way off several times more.
Now, when using the dogs as a fence, I keep them as far apart as possible to minimize the error.
Finally, a fellow researcher soul with actual numbers instead of "super duper CNC precision" armwaving!
Was 0.003" the standard deviation? Was there any wiggle in Qwas dogs?
I made my top myself with old Ryobi router and regular Festool guide rail, and I think I got better precision and accuracy. I'll check and report.
shaun.mcc said:Need some help...got my new MFT/3...before I cut on it I need to square it up.
Well, those nice Woodpecker one-time tools make me yearn for a nice speed square or (if I had ordered earlier and was patient) the new Woodpecker MFT square. What all do you recommend? I'm sure my $10.00 speed square is not sufficient [embarassed]...I have a little 12" Woodpecker (that doesn't sound right)...T-Square.
Anderson-Plywood said:The new series of Anderson MFT squares are out!
We have trimmed square edges with Festool Trim Router and used the Festool VAC SYS (the new vacuum clamp) to hold the piece.
They look and feel much nicer now!
I will post pictures later on. [big grin]
Here is the link to the Anderson MFT Square:http://www.andersonplywood.com/square-for-festool-mft-square/
Here is the Trim Router we used:http://www.andersonplywood.com/mfk-700-modular-trim-router-set-festool-574368-fes574368/
Here is the link to Festool VAC SYS Clamp:http://www.andersonplywood.com/festool-vac-sys-system-set-57000004-fes57000004/
grainhaus said:Just purchased, looking forward to using this!
Thanks!
Anderson-Plywood said:The new series of Anderson MFT squares are out!
We have trimmed square edges with Festool Trim Router and used the Festool VAC SYS (the new vacuum clamp) to hold the piece.
They look and feel much nicer now!
I will post pictures later on. [big grin]
Here is the link to the Anderson MFT Square:http://www.andersonplywood.com/square-for-festool-mft-square/
Here is the Trim Router we used:http://www.andersonplywood.com/mfk-700-modular-trim-router-set-festool-574368-fes574368/
Here is the link to Festool VAC SYS Clamp:http://www.andersonplywood.com/festool-vac-sys-system-set-57000004-fes57000004/
QuailRider43 said:Easy 5 min setup, and no additional squares needed.
Bert Vanderveen said:but the square — whatever kind you prefer — is convenient to check for squareness periodically, without having to go through to whole setup procedure again.
Acrobat said:Not knocking all the great squares on offer throughout this post but if the original poster or anyone else hasn't purchased a square for their MFT but has the Festool MFS profiles, simply join them into a rectangle and use that. All the sides are very accurate and when assembled you'll get a pretty darn good square for nix.
I believe there is a "Setting up your MFT" guide in the Festools links page here that shows it and other handy info within it too. [smile]
TrophyJoe said:Recently bought the Anderson square. Dead on accurate and hefty--no thin alum or steel blades. Shipping was worth it because they did an outstanding job of packing it and it arrived in perfect condition. Highly recommended and an excellent value, even with the shipping.
I just wish there was an option for a bigger version, say 24" x 32".