Michael_MA said:
Funny, because Festool (HQ) as well as major paint manufacturers (SIKKENS) over here give recommendation for using Rubin in 60/80 for removing old paints and varnishes.. maybe you have different compositions in the chemistry, but in my perticular example it worked like a charm.
...... I did only have a very thin clear laquer left on the stair, but it was really sticky.
I am from Holland and am very familiar with both Sikkens' paint line-up and Festool's sandpaper. Your Rubin might have worked on the thin clear lacquer of your stairs, but that doesn't mean Rubin is best suited for the job. And don't forget clear lacquer is the most easiest of finishes to remove because it has very little solids compared to opaque (non clear) paint. With real paint, your Rubin would have clogged up very quickly. You would need more Rubin discs than when using Brilliant 2, Cristal or the new Granite paper.
Michael_MA said:
Here is the recommendation from Sikkens: (sorry only in German)
http://www.ruetue.de/downloads/broschuerefestool.pdf
Glucklich is est fur mich kein Problem um Deutsch zu sprechen oder lesen. / Luckily it's no problem for me to speak or read German.
The Sikkens brochure is a bit old as it's from 2004 and talks about Brilliant sandpaper while Festool has already updated the formula to Brilliant 2 (two). When we talk about Brilliant here on the forum we nearly always mean Brilliant 2. I don't know why Festool changed the formula and what the difference exactly is, but I guess Brilliant 2 stands out more from Rubin than Brilliant did when it comes to it's application on paint.
There are two boxes in the brochure you mention and only in those boxes do they mention sandpaper recommendations.
The first on page 5, called "Festool ? Schleifsysteme f?r Sikkens Holzbau Lacke und Lasuren" speaks about Rubin being used on untreated wood only (Nadelholz unbehandelt & Laubholz unbehandelt).
The second box on page 7 mentions Brilliant under 'Anwendungen' (applications) as suited for "Hochleistungsschleifmittel f?r Farben und Lacke" (abrasive for paint and lacquer), and mentions Rubin as suited for "Hochleistungsschleifmittel f?r Holzwerkstoffe" (abrasive for 'woodproducts'). It does mention paint and lacquer under Rubin in that same box, a bit confusing, but I guess they mean it in the sense of 'occasionally' and not necessarily as the 'best' solution.
And as for Festool's recommendation, they have this excellent
online brochure where they make their recommendations, and Rubin is only mentioned for bare wood and not for paint.
nickao said:
Irregardless of what that says and your results, the Rubin I have used and I have used plenty, sucks for removing finishes.
I agree.
nickao said:
If I could only have one sand paper it would be Cristal.
My choice as an all rounder would be Brilliant 2, and perhaps the new Granite paper, but I've had too little experience with Granite yet.
Cristal is really only for the tough jobs where you need and aggressive abrasive. It is very sharp and doesn't clog fast. It's grids only range from 40 to 120 though which makes it only suitable for preparing the first coat. I wouldn't want to use that between coats though, in fear of maiming my freshly primed surface. Once the rough work has been done with Cristal up to 120 then you need to progress with Brilliant 2 180 to 320. Or Rubin, when you're on bare wood. And I wouldn't even dare to touch plastics with Cristal. It's really Brilliant 2 that can do most work on most materials.