jonny,
What you're saying about the time period for nominations is covered in the fact that any project submitted at any time can be considered in the contest. I made that change based on nickao's point about people holding back on submitting. Now that I have thought about the "open" deadline, I see many other benefits to it, so thanks to nickao for challenging me with that issue!
OK, it seems we have a lot of support for rotating contest subjects. That's great. Because of the open-deadlines concept, a rotating schedule works even better. We could have a schedule like this, for example...
- May 2008: Projects (including adult/child projects)
- June 2008: Jigs and Inventions
- July 2008: How-To
- August 2008: Projects
...And so on from there.
People can continue submitting projects and jigs at any time. That will also allow a good number of entries to build up in between.
One last question needs to be addressed: choosing winners. I've mentioned using polls, but that can be confusing, difficult to manage, and often gets too few responses. The other way to do it is to have judges. I've received e-mails from several members offering to be judges. That sounds better than a poll. We could have a panel of three to five judges. They would all be respected members of the forum. We'd work out a way to come up with winners each month. The judge panel could rotate each month, or it could remain the same. For example, the winner of the previous month's contest could become a judge the next month (of course, judges would not be eligible to compete).
I think this is moving in a good direction. It may seem confusing now, as we have this messy debate, but I have confidence that in the end we'll come up with a terrific contest system.
Matthew