Chess set

[Packard]

This is a fairly famous Lanier Graham mid-century modern chess set. There is a bit of a learning curve identifying the pieces, but I think I can make them all on the table saw. I will probably need my tenoning jig to make the end cuts. And the question is what size stock to use? 1” square stock, 1-1/4” square or 1-1/2” square.

It looks like, maybe maple? And walnut for the black pieces?

Any thoughts?

 

[Nisbeth]

https://www.moma.org/collection/works/4746

Looks like the pawns are 1" cubes then?

EDIT: There's another version here where they are 30mm cubes: https://woodideas.store/products/co...ndmade-lanier-graham-chess-set-with-board-box

 

[peter halle]

The dark squares look like Wenge to me.

Peter

 

[luvmytoolz]

If you apply the Golden Mean, working on a cube being 1", that gives a board square of 1.6", which looks pretty much like the board in the pic.

So I'd base the size of the pieces on the relative Golden Mean value of what size the squares will be. Definitely not smaller than an inch though.

 

[Packard]

The Queen (I guess) with the V-notch at the top is going to take some thought on how to fabricate. The rest of the pieces look pretty straightforward.

I’m guessing I set my table saw blade at an angle and use my tenoning jig to hold it. Then turn the piece around and repeat. I would have to use my dado blade. My rip, crosscut and combination blades have alternating carbide tips and would not yield a clean cut in the corner. That would go for the pieces with shoulder cuts too.

So, the pieces don’t look difficult, but will require thought.

$500 for the set seems a bit rich, though.

 

[Packard]

https://www.moma.org/collection/works/4746

Looks like the pawns are 1" cubes then?

EDIT: There's another version here where they are 30mm cubes: https://woodideas.store/products/co...ndmade-lanier-graham-chess-set-with-board-box

The pawns are cubes. The rooks are similar but taller. The King has to be the tallest, the Queen the second tallest. I am undecided on the bishop and the knight—it is not clear which is which.

 

[Michael Kellough]

The Queen (I guess) with the V-notch at the top is going to take some thought on how to fabricate. The rest of the pieces look pretty straightforward.

I’m guessing I set my table saw blade at an angle and use my tenoning jig to hold it. Then turn the piece around and repeat. I would have to use my dado blade. My rip, crosscut and combination blades have alternating carbide tips and would not yield a clean cut in the corner. That would go for the pieces with shoulder cuts too.

So, the pieces don’t look difficult, but will require thought.

$500 for the set seems a bit rich, though.

Use a long piece of stock to make/prepare for multiple Queen’s. After the first half-V cut turn the stock over, not around.

 

[flair woodworks]

The dark wood looks like wenge to me. It's quite a splintery wood if you haven't worked with it before, and it's among my least favourite woods to work. I would make all the cuts on the table saw with stock laying down against the crosscut fence/mitre gauge.

 

[Packard]

According to the American Chess Federation, the standard chess board square is 2-1/4”.

The base diameter of the King is 1.75” and the height of the King is 3.75”.

I am allowing myself a lot of leeway, but I think 1-1/2” square stock will be easier to work with than smaller sizes. I will make a few prototype pieces first.

 

[Duckler]

This is a fairly famous Lanier Graham mid-century modern chess set. There is a bit of a learning curve identifying the pieces, but I think I can make them all on the table saw. I will probably need my tenoning jig to make the end cuts. And the question is what size stock to use? 1” square stock, 1-1/4” square or 1-1/2” square.

It looks like, maybe maple? And walnut for the black pieces?

Any thoughts?

View attachment 381082

Do you have a bandsaw?
Might be easier on that.

 

[Mini Me]

Do you have a bandsaw?
Might be easier on that.

Or a handsaw?

 

[Crazyraceguy]

The dark wood looks like wenge to me. It's quite a splintery wood if you haven't worked with it before, and it's among my least favourite woods to work. I would make all the cuts on the table saw with stock laying down against the crosscut fence/mitre gauge.

It could also be Palm? which is even worse to work with.

 

[Crazyraceguy]

The pawns are cubes. The rooks are similar but taller. The King has to be the tallest, the Queen the second tallest. I am undecided on the bishop and the knight—it is not clear which is which.

The Bishop is the wedge top, the Knight is the one that looks like a chair.
Personally, I would add to the tops of the Castles, buy cutting a groove X across the tops. Imagine and old-school White Castle restaurant.

 

[Packard]

The Bishop is the wedge top, the Knight is the one that looks like a chair.
Personally, I would add to the tops of the Castles, buy cutting a groove X across the tops. Imagine and old-school White Castle restaurant.

I’m going to make some prototypes from some pine 1-1/2” square stock I have. I thought about adding the cuts for the castle, but I am concerned that they might end up casualties of combat.

Addendum: I could not think of the word at the time I was posting. I wanted to use “crenelated”. See image below. I just learned that the high points on the castles are “Merlons”. So posting on FOG is culturally educational as well as woodworking educational.

Addendum: I have hand saws (back saws, coping saws, fret saws and pull saws included). I have a band saw, a radial arm saw, a table saw, a scroll saw and a jewelers saw. I also have mortising machine.

But in the end, I think all the pieces will be made on the talble saw. It would be the fastest and most repeatable and cleanest result.

 

[Crazyraceguy]

I always heard the term Parapet, as the low wall around the walkway. However, your definition seems more accurate, or at least an older term?