Steven Owen said:
yetihunter said:
If I had to sell all of my sanders but one, I'd
definitely keep the ETS-EC 150/3, no debate.
I'm sure the 5mm stroke version, the 125 version
with a 150mm pad of a Mirka Deros would all
fit the same bill.
I do like my ets 125 (pro5), but it's
a nice addition and not a do-all.
I use it with high grits between/after
finish or any time I need to be gentle or
the 150 is too large.
I have most of the Festool sanders and
the ETS 150 EC and ETS 125/Pro5 get used
the most for woodworking.
I would think the results would be between the 3 mm and 5 mm stoke in grits under 180 would be negligible. It would simply decide on the removal rates. At 220, 320, 400, the smaller stroke would have more of a impact on grain clarity.
I never understood the rationale for having a paddle speed control on a wood sander. A paddle makes sense in fibreglass and metal. You vary speeds constantly. Most wood finish sanding is done with a constant speed letting the sander do work with only enough pressure to keep the sander under control.
I don’t get the paddle on the Deros. It’s not an air sander. The speed dial makes more sense for wood sanding. You set for the speed you want; that’s it.
It is not something that requires a lot of cognitive load... You just push the paddle and the (DEROS) sander goes.
Maybe it doesn't make sense, but motorcycles, cars, sewing machines, battery powered drills almost all have a throttle of some sort... Either using the paws or the feet, or a thumb.
As far grain clarity goes, I am not sure... The 5-my looks pretty good, but then one cannot go too far astray with the 3-mm. It sort of depends on what "do it all" and "one sander" means... I.e mostly finish with some rough sanding, or mostly rough sanding with some finish sanding.
Neither one is a bad choice. Both have twice the power of the non EC version of an ETS, so they would arguably be faster and hence better if speed is a concern.