Blues said:
Hi Oliver,
You make some great points. And certainly makes sense.. which is may be why companies like Festool are trying to catch up in this space.
One might also argue that it is precisely for the exact reasons you state that an international forum (owned by Festool ofcourse) with knowledgeable users such as you and Peter need to put things in perspective for the ones who are unaware.
Clearly no user of tools no matter where in the world they are would like to spend on any tool..any more than they have to. So would it not be a kida moral obligation to call that out and provide the right steer or stay away from creating this awareness?
I was curious as to why someone as knowledgeable as Peter would spend time to loan a dated equipment to create this video. And may be you answered it in a way.
Thanks again for indging me with this positive conversation.
Now I can't speak for Peter, nor would I ever attempt to do so.
My personal opinion is that the TID, being a fairly newly released tool from Festool, is not dated per se. And people obviously want to see it being demonstrated, discussed. That's were Peter's pretty unique videos come into play, as they offer much more information than typical "power shoot out"-type videos or the like. And that's surely one of the reasons he has been asked to make a video about the TID. And if you follow Peter long enough, you know that his advice is sound and solid - but he also strongly encourages people to make their own decisions/ gain experience of their own. I'm sure there are many people wo are now, thanks to Peter's video, able to make a good decision.
Side by side comparisons are tricky, especially if you are used to a certain brand and how their tools adapt to your hand/ work for you. It's also a costly endeavor, if it is not sponsored - or all loaners. And how much time is one going to spend on preparing all of this?
The other option, simply mentioning other tools/ steering people in direction of tools one has not worked with - I don't see how that is going to do any good. Especially when you haven't had these in hand and can't base advice on a solid foundation.
I can think of quite a few moral obligations I'd consider absolutely valid. But in this instance, saying it would be a kind of moral obligation to enhance your viewers view on the overall power tool market and steer them in the direction of competing manufacturers/ competitor products because they have tools with apparently more power or ones that are less noisy/ feature different driving technology, I don't think so.
It would be if you did a comparison, if you called your video something like "Impact drivers, market overview".
But this is a video about the TID and only that, it is called: Festool TID 18 - Product Overview. That is what the title promises and Peter's video delivers.
On top of that, you can return any Festool tool you are not happy with within a 30 day window for a full refund.
If someone is only happy with a Festool tool if it is, totally inarguable, best in everything - and buyers remorse sets in immediately because there might be a more powerful tool, a nicer tool, a less noisy tool, a tool with different driving technology that is more "up to date" (whatever that means) than that is exactly that persons problem.
I work with my (Festool) tools, I've had incredible and fantastic results with them, these tools work for me like no others. I feel that in a way they are empowering me to take on projects I would not have done if it weren't for that deep trust in the tool(s) and by now my experience, and knowledge on how to work with them. I'm very happy with the way Festool treats, and communicates with, me, even as one of their smallest customers.
To put this in perspective: I bought a, by now "outdated", Snap-On 1/2" impact wrench. It works great, it does everything I need it to do and more. A couple of weeks, maybe it was even 3 months, not sure I recall correctly, later, they introduced a new model with a brushless drive/motor and more torque. Does this make the tool I have, use, and that works for me a poor tool? Do I suddenly need more torque for the same type of use, just because a new model would deliver more?
I'm writing this on a 13" MacBook Air from mid 2012. It's been a reliable companion for the last 7 or 8 years. It still does everything I need it to do. And if asked about it, I would tell anyone how pleased I'm with it. If I did vlogs, people would constantly see it. Sure there are nicer MacBooks by now, with more features & more of everything. Does it make my MBA from 2012 a bad product?
Personally, and this is just offered by me as a thought: What you describe as moral obligation, I consider it a problem to people who have FOMO (fear of missing out).
If a tool works, does what it is supposed to do, fits your hand/ way of working - it is a good tool. No matter if there are newer, shinier, more powerful - or *whatever* tools available from different manufacturers, in different markets at different prices.
Last but not least, people simply need to own up to the decisions they make. If they overspent on stuff without being able to justify that for themselves, or worse jeopardizing their personal or families finances - now that again is a way deeper rooted problem, than any Youtube video not explicitly mentioning availability of (cheaper, more powerful, less noisy, (...)) models of any given product.
I hope this explains my view on the overall subject well.
Kind regards,
Oliver