promark747
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Messages
- 501
[quote author=Sometimewoodworker]
a riving knife makes the kickback less likely to occur in the first place.
They also say that not having the safety feature makes changing blades faster as you don't need to swap the riving knife, another point that Festool makes unnecessary by having all blades have the same kerf.
It is more likely that there are patients for a retractable riving knife so they had to work round them.
In the case of sheet goods and a track the chances of kickback are vanishingly small unless you plunge into the board so the Mafell isn't usually less safe, but bring in solid wood and the Festool saws are safer.
The statements are typical of wriggling around a point. The claim that because the maximum blade speed is 20% higher than other saws only has an effect if you can run a maximum speed. But if you need to slow the saw down to avoid burning the wood it has no benefit
[/quote]
All good points
a riving knife makes the kickback less likely to occur in the first place.
They also say that not having the safety feature makes changing blades faster as you don't need to swap the riving knife, another point that Festool makes unnecessary by having all blades have the same kerf.
It is more likely that there are patients for a retractable riving knife so they had to work round them.
In the case of sheet goods and a track the chances of kickback are vanishingly small unless you plunge into the board so the Mafell isn't usually less safe, but bring in solid wood and the Festool saws are safer.
The statements are typical of wriggling around a point. The claim that because the maximum blade speed is 20% higher than other saws only has an effect if you can run a maximum speed. But if you need to slow the saw down to avoid burning the wood it has no benefit
[/quote]
All good points