thedude306 said:The KSS400 vs MT55cc is a what are you going to do with it question? I have both. I wouldn't want to do the framing I do with the MT55 and I love the MT55 for sheet goods.
The KSS does almost as good on cutting sheet goods except there is no scoring function and the dust collection is only great, not excellent. They use the same blades and can use the same mafell/bosch rails.
The MT55 I got came in a classic systainer. The KSS400 was in a cardboard box as the attached rail is big but I think you can purchase a metal case for it.
Don't mind my daughter, she was pretty excited about the purchase!
![]()
JimH2 said:You have sold me on the MT55. A commission is in order.
thedude306 said:JimH2 said:You have sold me on the MT55. A commission is in order.
It's a great saw! Make sure you tell timberwolf... LOL
Another thing of note is the saw is off the line when doing an bevel on the festool rails, just to be aware of that. ( I think the festool rails make the MT55 sit higher??) I also got the position indicator and like it. It's an extra but nice to have.
JimH2 said:thedude306 said:JimH2 said:You have sold me on the MT55. A commission is in order.
It's a great saw! Make sure you tell timberwolf... LOL
Another thing of note is the saw is off the line when doing an bevel on the festool rails, just to be aware of that. ( I think the festool rails make the MT55 sit higher??) I also got the position indicator and like it. It's an extra but nice to have.
I am committing to a few rails as well to avoid any confusion and to get the best out of the tool.
ivanhoe said:...Really love the scoring function of the MT 55...
One other advantage of the Mafell rails I've read about is that they are designed to accept a vacuum hold-down attachment. One simply connects a short hose between the rail and the top of a "Y"; the other "Y" top goes to the saw for dust extraction and the bottom of the "Y" goes to the vac. I'm interested if anyone has this option and if so, how they like it and what it cost (from Timberwolf). Also, I understand the Mafell and Festool rails are not the same thickness. I assume the Mafell rail is the thicker and stiffer, but I'm not sure about that. Can anyone clarify that for me? I'm interested because if one lifts the Festool rail with the saw resting on it (to slide material for the next cut), the rail flexes quite a bit.sfay said:I'm a huge fan of Festool but Mafell has the edge in many ways. Their guide rails are a major improvement over Festool's...
Cary Swoveland said:ivanhoe said:...Really love the scoring function of the MT 55...
I don't quite understand how that works. Some sliding table saws have small scoring blade on the operator's side of the saw that rotates in the opposite direction of the main blade. (On a table saw the risk of chipout is on the bottom face of the material, of course; on a circular saw it's on the top face.) On the Mafell, a scoring pass is first made, which uses the main blade. Although it is a very shallow cut, I don't understand why it avoids chipout, considering the direction of blade rotation. (I am aware of the 0.1mm offset for the subsequent full cut.) Can you explain?
Bohdan said:Does that mean that that you set the depth of cut to a very shallow scoring cut first and then repeat the cut full depth.
Won't this also apply to all other brands of track saw or is there a special angle on the blade.
thedude306 said:...The Mafell/Bosch rails are thicker I believe...