greg mann said:
I had a similar problem with 3/4 stock, that is, not getting flush surfaces. I finally realized I had made some cuts without overhanging the stock and was actually registering off the benchtop instead of the top of the stock. My Domino is not in possession of me right now so I can't check but I believe the slot is centered 10mm off the base. If you are machining 3/4 stock and registering off the top your base will want to be below the stock by about 1mm or .037". Are you sure you can rule this out as a cause?
Thanks for all your helpful ideas and comments. Let me try to address many of them here.
I can rule out registration of the benchtop as a cause - the workpieces were large enough that they overhung my MFT 1080 by several inches when flat, or by a few inches when clamped against the side rail.
No, I did not try microwaving the dominos or drying them in an oven. Good idea. But I found them tight in the winter, too when humidity in Ohio is low.
I did always use the same reference edges. Before cutting the mortices, I lined up the four panels of the cabinet, and marked their front edges, back edges, matching corners and outside faces. The lateral position of the first mortise in each panel was referenced from the front edge of that panel, using the locating pins of the Domino and narrowest setting. No problem with these mortices matching lateral position from the front edge of the respective panels. (The first cabinet came out perfect in regard to registration of the outside faces and front edges - thank you, Jerry.)
Wobbling the Domino - I don't think that I did. I set the Domino fence flat on the stock and held the machine against the work using the handle within the Domino fence. For machining mortices at 90 degrees relative to the main flat surfaces of the plywood workpieces, I took care to stack those pieces to provide a broader support surface for the fence of the Domino machine so it could not rock and thus change the angle and position of the mortice.
I got the problematic second box (in which I tried to trust the Domino locator pins) assembled last night. As expected, the registry of the outside faces is somewhat off (~1 mm max on a couple of the corners). On closer inspection of the mortices, my conclusion is that when mortising the flat faces of plywood, I need to be much more careful to ensure that chips and "hanging chaff" from the previously cut mortice is not interfering with registry of the locating pin. I probably need to go much slower when plunging the Domino machine. But pencil lines seem to be the only way to be certaiin that the locator pin is abutted against the side of the previous mortice, since it is hard to see the locator pin position relative to the side of a previously cut mortice. You can always easily see the centerline of the Domino fence! In my limited experience with my Domino machine, pencil marking with a try square works quite well, even with use of the narrowest setting for all mortices, and the use of an Incra 90 degree bent corner rule with a mechanical pencil makes this accurate within 0.02 inch?. So, if I have to mark as a check on the locator pin function ... the locator pin is not going to get much use by me.
The plywood is not wavy. Its surprisingly uniform given its low price of ~$26 from HD. Eight interior plys plus 2 thinner face plys in 3/4 inch thickness.
One other lesson I learned with plywood and dominos - be sure to fully seat the dominos in the edges of the plywood (those which are oriented parallel to the plies and faces of the plywood, and then join the plywood piece that has mortices oriented perpendicular to the plies. Otherwise, if the dominos are as tight fitting as mine were, you risk a causing delamination or penetration by a domino being forced back through the rest of the plies of the piece with the mortices oriented perpendicular to the plies. (I slightly did this on one corner as I was drawing the glued joint home with bar clamps. Solution - gently and progressively knock the joint home with a mallet centering your blows over the dominos.
Dave R.