Michael Kellough said:I get the impression that the shape of the reservoir is irrelevant, that all the important stuff happens in the DD itself. If so, why should the reservoir be any larger in diameter than the DD? The setup would be a lot more compact if the DD sat on top of a length of 8" Sonotube attached to the handle of the vac, and keep the deck of the vac clear for active Systainers. I think there may more versatile options for a tall tube like reservoir. Am I right in thinking that a smaller diameter tube/drum is more resistant to imploding?
festeringtool said:sounds nuts to me!
I just wonder if any of you people actually use these tools or just play with them as above!
ken257 said:To get back on topic I love the idea and the implementation in a systainer. It is great to have the whole setup portable and to be able to role it around the shop or worksite. Will the cyclone fit in the plywood lined systainer? This would make tranportation a breeze.
Scott W. said:ken257 said:To get back on topic I love the idea and the implementation in a systainer. It is great to have the whole setup portable and to be able to role it around the shop or worksite. Will the cyclone fit in the plywood lined systainer? This would make tranportation a breeze.
I didn't try it but I'll bet the DD will fit in the systainer 5 with the liner. I think it is less than 12 inches tall.
Scott W.