Katz-Moses' Miter Rail

smorgasbord

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
1,656
Location
NorCal
My tablesaw is an old Inca 2100. Great saw - 12" blade, big table, overhead guard, blade rises up in a straight line, etc., but one problem I've always struggled with is that the miter slots are a non-standard 20mm wide. Even though that's just under a single millimeter wider than the standard ¾" slots, it's enough that few of the adjustable after-market miter bars sold (at least that I could find) would not fit, and those that would fit (like the MicroJig Zero-Play) were too short for my purposes. I had taken to using the adjustable bars with a strip of HDPE tape on one side to expand the width enough, but I can never get the tape to last/stick more than a few months (weeks under heavy use). And the adjustable bar circles wear out and need constant tweaking with medium/heavy use, too.

Jonathan Katz-Moses just announced his adjustable miter bar, and to my surprise it supports up to 21.26mm (0.837") slot widths. So, I spent $90 plus tax and shipping and ordered one.

It's good, but not perfect.

Here are some photos. Basically, the body (in red) has 3 sets of 2 ball-bearings. Then there's a sub-piece (silver) that has 3 ball bearings, each one located in between the set of 2 on the other side of the bar.

KM MiterRailOverall.jpg

KM MiterRailOverall2.jpg

There are grub screws at each end of the bar that you adjust (push-pull) that moves the silver bar fore-after in angled slots so the silver bar also moves in/out, thus changing the width.

KM SingleBearingEnd.jpg

In his product video (link), he shows his sled sliding really easily on his table. I found that while I could get a no-perceptible wiggle adjustment on my saw or I could get the bar to continue to slide after I stopped pushing it, I couldn't have both - if the bar was adjusted to no wiggle then it was too tight to just keep going. That said, this wasn't my expectation for this anyway, and I found I could tweak the width to get a no-wiggle fit with enough smoothness that pushing it wasn't an issue, and that it was easier to push than the adjustable bars with the circles.

I was a bit concerned that with the adjustment being for the whole bar that my slot might have worn over the decades to be a tad wider in the front than in the back and so there might be some fit/wiggle concerns, but that doesn't appear to be an issue for me so far.

Perhaps the biggest issue, for me anyway, is the shortish length combined with effectively having just 3 points of contact. A bit more than half the bar has to be the slot for any kind of accuracy. So, at a 20" length you need at least 11" of bar in the table, so you've got only about 8" or so of bar beyond the front of your table to your raised blade. For "normal" sized cross-cutting this is probably fine, but this wouldn't be my choice for a wide stock cross-cut sled. That said, he does sell a slightly cheaper 8" long version, and perhaps one could combine two of those in a line, or stack the 8" with the 20". But, that gets expensive and alignment might be tricky.

One really clever aspect is that the bar is fitted with a number of very pointy grub screws (more like tacks) that are threaded into the bar so you can remove them, but they enable you to put the bar in the slot and press down on your sled base to stick/align them. The tacks hold well enough in plywood and MDF that you can then lift the base up with the bar attached, and then screw up/down as desired.

Overall, I give this a thumbs up. It's not cheap, but it appears well made and does what it needs to. Unlike the plastic circle adjustable bars, this shouldn't wear out quickly, and unlike wood runners it won't expand/contract with humidity.

-----

As a side note, I've been spending some of my spare hours in the shop working on a CNC'd miter bar that uses the compressibility/springability of wood/phenolic to self-compensate for wear. This came from my YARSB (Yet Another Router Sub-Base) effort where I made a phenolic attachment to ride in the groove of a track saw track:
https://festoolownersgroup.com/threads/yarsb-yet-another-router-sub-base.76896/#post-741606 , applying the same principle to the miter bar. As I sort that out I'll post on that, too.
 
Last edited:
It’s nothing fancy but this Rockler rail is 36” and uses adjustable grub screws. You could replace the grub screws with longer ones.
The problem with that design is that the protruding screws get caught up on the entrance to the slot. The more typical "circles" solve that problem, but again, they wear down pretty quickly. There are also versions with a split down the middle of the bar and a screw from the top/bottom acting as a wedge to spread the sides apart, but then you don't have a true straight bar edge.

There is also the Woodpeckers 25.5" MITER BAR . I like that it has springs to keep it aligned. Less expensive than the Jonathan Katz-Moses version.

Bob
I looked at that a while back, but unfortunately for me it doesn't handle a 20mm wide slot. If I had a 3D printer maybe i could design a wider replacement spring, though.

My design uses the compressibility of phenolic or wood to enable a single piece bar with a spring mechanism, which started out like this:
WoodSpringBarFirstDesign.jpg

But is now this;
MBCUHeadAttachmentMilling.jpg
NewSpringDesign.jpg
 
I figured wood or phenolic slides in long length would be too flexible. Does the Inca have two miter slots?

40+ years ago I made a large sled for cutting complimentary miters. It has two hard maple slides (simply waxed) but they’re fastened to the 3 foot deep (front to back) sled with screws every 4”. Although it was acquired a lot of not very attractive patina it remains functional. Using two slides is better. I did have to dress the miter slots on my ~ 1950 Walker Turner saw.
 
I probably have more phenolic than everyone who regularly posts on this website combined would use in five years.
Not throwing this out as a challenge, but I would sure like to figure out ways to convert my supply into cash AND get the phenolic out ot others who could put it to good use.
:)
 
I have a sled. I almost never use it. I also have a Craftsman radial arm saw. I generally find it easier to use and more convenient than the sled.

About 25 years ago, I bought the saw from my neighbor for $100.00. There are millions of these RAS out there, and you can probably find one used for less than the sled shown (I’ve seen them for $75.00).

The Craftsman saw is not nearly as competent as the Delta, but certainly more capable than the sled. I can cross cut about 16 - 18 inches (never measured). I can also cut dados with it. You do need to tune it, if you get one. You most certainly need to make sure that there is no play in the sliding bearings, as that can be a safety issue.

And you have to make sure that the 90 degree cut is accurate (I never reset the angle).
 
I figured wood or phenolic slides in long length would be too flexible. Does the Inca have two miter slots?

40+ years ago I made a large sled for cutting complimentary miters. It has two hard maple slides (simply waxed) but they’re fastened to the 3 foot deep (front to back) sled with screws every 4”. Although it was acquired a lot of not very attractive patina it remains functional. Using two slides is better. I did have to dress the miter slots on my ~ 1950 Walker Turner saw.

I did make a miter bar for my Inca miter gauge head out of phenolic, and yeah, it's flimsy when not fully in the slot. But, for miter gauge use I'm not cutting wide stuff and with the miter gauge you want the head and fence supported by the table anyway, so it's for not-wide stock and is OK. That said, I did splurge and buy some Argentinian Lignum Vitae and made a bar and it's pretty rigid - not as rigid as aluminum, but rigid enough that I had to modify my spring dimensions since I could barely push the bar through using the same interference fits as the phenolic that slid very smoothly.

But, while a miter gauge bar probably should be rigid, bars attached to the underside of sleds are supported and don't have to be rigid at all.

I no longer make sleds that span the blade. I have one-sided sleds and use a non-sliding support piece on the other side when needed. This is pretty standard these days.

But, yeah, with two runners you can actually make them narrower than the slots and then push them together (or apart) to get a "right-tight fit™" that will not perceptibly change with humidity.

All of my sleds from the past 3 decades are similar to the old "Dubby" design:


Which is still available: https://www.amazon.com/Original-Cut-Off-Cutting-Accurate-Miters/dp/B00CPTFHAW

BTW, Rockler has a new take on the single-side Dubby design that looks pretty neat:
Screenshot 2026-05-02 at 12.24.47 PM.png

My first one dates to the early naughts (like 2002), so maybe I invented this? 🤪Not sure when the Dubby first came out.

Lately, I have two sled:
• One with a "fixed" 90º back fence, which is now a Hondgui brand fence from their miter gauge. It has a nice zero-able measure on top, has the usual extendable thing at the other end, plus the flip stop has micro-adjust. Since it's an open-ended aluminum extrusion, I was able to design and make a zero-clearance fence insert using dowels and a thumb screw to change it out (for things like blade being tilted). It's on a pivot with an adjustable stop block at the far end, so I can tweak it to be 5-cut square even if things drift over time/use. The Dubby and Rockler and Powertec (and others I'm sure) also use this fence on a pivot with a 90º stop block and screw sticking out for micro-adjust design. It works pretty well, but for large panel dead-nuts accuracy I find locking down a 90º is better as with movement there's always some play.

• A sled of my own design, using a curved grid of CNC-machined holes using pegs combined with a taper gauge to produce uber-accurate angles even at non-standard sizes. I should productize that someday, and see if I can adapt it for track saw use. I think the track saw version, if actually practical, might be a product. Right now I keep having to decide if I'm a woodworking or a woodworking tool builder.
 
I would machine the slot wider and make a really good miter bar to fit properly using two tapered halves that would slide against one another to be a snug fit in the slot. My old cabinet saw had a slot that varied in width and if I had kept it that was my intention to fix it. You could machine the slot wider and fill it back to a standard size by fixing in filler strips to form the slot and it would most likely a cheaper exercise than buying fancy band aid solutions.
 
Back
Top